New Hubble Data Shed Light on What Keeps the Magellanic Clouds Glowing

New Hubble data shed light on how the Milky Way's two brightest satellite galaxies maintain their youthful glow

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Our galaxy, the Milky Way, is more than just a giant spiral harboring hundreds of billions of stars. It's also the hub of a gargantuan empire that stretches over more than a million light-years and rules some two dozen lesser galaxies, which revolve around it the way moons orbit a giant planet.

Of all our galaxy's many satellites, none compares to the Magellanic Clouds—a pair of bold and beautiful galaxies far more lively and lustrous than any other in the Milky Way's retinue. Visible in the southern sky as fragments of glowing mist, this galactic duo poses something of a mystery to astronomers. The Milky Way's gravity has robbed all its other satellites of the gas they need to make stars, so how have the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds remained so bright and bountiful, filled with brilliant young stars and the gas and dust that create them?

Evidence is mounting that the Magellanic Clouds are so healthy because until recently they have avoided the Milky Way and its gas-grabbing tactics. Seven years ago Nitya Kallivayalil, an astronomer now at Yale University, and her colleagues reported Hubble Space Telescope observations showing that their orbit was much more enormous than previously thought. Prior to Kallivayalil's work, astronomers thought the Magellanic Clouds orbited our galaxy every one or two billion years. Now it seems they require at least four billion years to fully revolve around it—and possibly much longer. Her latest Hubble data, published in February, yield a more precise path for the pair and strengthen her initial discovery, suggesting the Magellanic Clouds are most likely passing us for the first time, which would explain their youthful glow.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Yet even the clouds' splendor will someday fade. Gurtina Besla, an astronomer at Columbia University, says tides from the Large Magellanic Cloud extract stars and gas from its smaller sibling, whose fate is bleak: “I think the Small Magellanic Cloud is on its way to becoming a dwarf spheroidal”—a ghostly, gas-poor object like the Milky Way's other satellites. Fortunately, that will take a long time. By venturing past the Milky Way only now, both galaxies still bear abundant gas to forge brilliant new stars that will deck southern skies for eons to come.

FURTHER READINGS AND CITATIONSScientificAmerican.com/apr2013/advances

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe