New Hybrid Solar Device Exploits the Best of Both Worlds

A hybrid approach combines the benefits of photovoltaic and solar-thermal technologies into a device the size of a fingernail

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The two most common ways of generating power from the sun both have their drawbacks. Photovoltaic cells, which absorb photons from sunlight and convert them to electricity, operate with only 20 percent efficiency. That is because they can use only photons within a certain range of wavelengths to excite electrons. Solar-thermal systems, which turn sunlight into heat and then into electricity, are more efficient than photovoltaics—because they can use the entire solar spectrum, they can reach efficiencies of 30 percent—but they are impossible to scale down to rooftop size. The usual solar-thermal setup involves vast mirror arrays that concentrate sunlight, heating liquid that eventually powers an electricity-generating turbine.

To overcome the limitations of the two approaches, researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have created a device that combines elements of both, which they described in a February study in Nature Nanotechnology. (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.)

Their fingernail-size invention is known as a solar-thermophotovoltaic device. The first thing it does is produce heat from sunlight. Carbon nanotubes—extremely efficient absorbers of sunlight, which convert nearly the entire solar spectrum into heat—take care of that step. The heat then flows into a photonic crystal, which is composed of layers of silicon and silicon dioxide. Once the photonic crystal reaches approximately 1,000 degrees Celsius, it begins to glow, emitting mostly photons of a wavelength well matched to the photovoltaic cell below. When those photons strike the photovoltaic cell, they generate electricity.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The process of transforming light into heat and then back into light—and, finally, into electricity—is not simple. So far the thermophotovoltaic device has achieved only 3 percent efficiency. But “this is just a starting point,” says senior author Evelyn Wang. The key will be making it work on a larger scale. “If we can scale up, then we can get over 20 percent efficiencies,” Wang says.

Geoffrey Giller is a freelance science writer based in Ithaca, N.Y., and a former intern at Scientific American. His work has also appeared in Audubon, Hakai Magazine and The Scientist. You can follow him on Twitter @GeoffreyGiller.

More by Geoffrey Giller
Scientific American Magazine Vol 310 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Solar Times Two” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 310 No. 4 (), p. 27
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0414-27

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe