New Robot Helps Babies with Cerebral Palsy Learn to Crawl

The infants crawl sooner and farther than they would on their own

Olivia Rodriguez, who has normal motor development, test drives SIPPC. 

Hugh Scott Sooner Magazine

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For infants with cerebral palsy, crawling can be a challenge. The children, who suffer from brain damage that impairs muscle control, frequently give up trying to master moving across the floor. In turn, the brain stops building and reinforcing connections involved in developing motor skills and the ability to orient oneself in space, leading to further problems with movement later in life, says Thubi Kolobe, a physical therapist and researcher at the University of Oklahoma. “If you don't use it, you lose it—that's the motto of the brain,” she explains.

Following up on research showing that early intervention can improve motor control, Kolobe and her colleagues have developed a contraption meant to promote crawling. The device, called the Self-Initiated Prone Progression Crawler (SIPPC), consists of a high-tech onesie and a three-legged, wheeled robot equipped with a machine-learning algorithm. Sensors in the onesie detect a baby's kicks or shifts in weight, and the robot responds by pushing a support platform in the same direction, giving the baby a boost toward where he or she wants to go. In a preliminary 12-week trial, the researchers observed 28 infants at risk for cerebral palsy as they practiced crawling twice a week with SIPPC (an official diagnosis for the disorder usually takes place after the age of one). Infants who received boosts from SIPPC were able to move around a room almost a month earlier than those in a group who practiced with an unpowered version of the robot. And when the researchers followed up at 14 months of age, they found that the movement-aided infants were more likely to crawl independently, too.

The team is now expanding the trial and plans to enroll nearly 80 infants at risk of cerebral palsy. “Our hope is that we'll ultimately be able to have a robot therapy that can give these children more motor experience and improve their ability to engage in society and be independent when they grow up,” says bioengineering professor Andrew Fagg, a co-author of the study.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Credit: Brown Bird Design; SOURCE: “NOVEL ASSISTIVE DEVICE FOR TEACHING CRAWLING SKILLS TO INFANTS,” BY MUSTAFA A. GHAZI ET AL., IN FIELD AND SERVICE ROBOTICS, EDITED BY DAVID S. WETTERGREEN AND TIMOTHY D. BARFOOT. SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING, 2016

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe