New Theory Explains How Earth's Early Atmosphere Became Oxygen-Rich

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The loss of large amounts of hydrogen gas during the early stages of our atmosphere's evolution may account for why Earth's air is so rich in life-supporting oxygen today. So say scientists from the NASA Ames Research Center in a report appearing in the current issue of the journal Science.

"Without oxygen, the most sophisticated life on the earth would have been green microbial scum," study author David Catling notes. "Fortunately, some bacteria in the early oceans were able to separate water into hydrogen and oxygen." Indeed, this separation still takes place in photosynthetic organisms today. Using the energy of the sun, they break the water molecules apart and use the hydrogen to create organic compounds like carbohydrates, leaving oxygen behind as a by-product.

Conventional wisdom holds that large quantities of such hydrogen-laden organic matter were eventually buried in the earth, allowing oxygen to accumulate in the atmosphere. But Catling's team proposes instead that the hydrogen escaped into space through a process called methane photolysis, in which the hydrogen-containing methane reacts with oxygen such that hydrogen atoms are freed.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If correct, Catling's theory could explain why the early earth stayed warm enough for life to thrive. "Three billion years ago, the sun was only four fifths as bright as it is now," he observes. "The earth should have frozen over." Methane, however, is a very effective greenhouse gas, and, according to Catling, its concentration in the atmosphere back then was 100 to 1,000 times what it is today.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe