New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

New Theory Explains How Earth's Early Atmosphere Became Oxygen-Rich

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The loss of large amounts of hydrogen gas during the early stages of our atmosphere's evolution may account for why Earth's air is so rich in life-supporting oxygen today. So say scientists from the NASA Ames Research Center in a report appearing in the current issue of the journal Science.

"Without oxygen, the most sophisticated life on the earth would have been green microbial scum," study author David Catling notes. "Fortunately, some bacteria in the early oceans were able to separate water into hydrogen and oxygen." Indeed, this separation still takes place in photosynthetic organisms today. Using the energy of the sun, they break the water molecules apart and use the hydrogen to create organic compounds like carbohydrates, leaving oxygen behind as a by-product.

Conventional wisdom holds that large quantities of such hydrogen-laden organic matter were eventually buried in the earth, allowing oxygen to accumulate in the atmosphere. But Catling's team proposes instead that the hydrogen escaped into space through a process called methane photolysis, in which the hydrogen-containing methane reacts with oxygen such that hydrogen atoms are freed.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If correct, Catling's theory could explain why the early earth stayed warm enough for life to thrive. "Three billion years ago, the sun was only four fifths as bright as it is now," he observes. "The earth should have frozen over." Methane, however, is a very effective greenhouse gas, and, according to Catling, its concentration in the atmosphere back then was 100 to 1,000 times what it is today.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe