Nor’easters May Become More Intense with Climate Change

As Northeasterners hunker down to weather tonight’s potentially record-breaking winter storm, they may also want to brace themselves for even more severe nor’easters in the future

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Mad rushes to the grocery store usually mean one of two things in the U.S. Northeast: either a holiday or a nor’easter snowstorm is approaching. With the holiday season just behind us, the sparsely stocked supermarket shelves in the region are a sign of the latter—and tonight’s storm in particular is gearing up to be historic.
 
Nor’easters are born much like other storms. “They’re low pressure systems of the same kind that give us our precipitation in the United States throughout the year,” says Jeff Masters, director of meteorology at Weather Underground. “But they happen to form right off the Northeast coast and in winter.” The winds blowing from the northeast that give these storms their name also push them ashore.
 
The storms derive their energy from the contrast in air temperature between very cold, dense air from Canada that meets relatively warm, moist air coming off the Atlantic Ocean. “That difference in air masses can be converted to the energy of the winds and precipitation that come with the storm,” Masters says.
 
These gusts might feel harsh to people in the storm’s path, but they rarely reach the strength of even the most mild hurricane-force winds. Nevertheless, nor’easters can cause major destruction. The now-infamous blizzard of 1978 caused 99 deaths and an estimated $520 million in damage when it hit New England.
 
Super-severe nor’easters like this one may soon become the norm, according to Kevin Trenberth, senior scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo. “It is expected with climate change that snowfalls will increase as long as the temperatures are cold enough [for snow to fall]," he says. On average, the air above the ocean will be warmer than it would have been, "and the atmosphere can hold 4 percent more moisture for every 1 degree Fahrenheit increase in temperature,” he says. Once the cold air from Canada hits this ocean air that is more moisture-laden then usual, an even greater amount of snow than normal will be dumped on the Northeast.
 
[Read more about climate change’s intensifying effect on storms here]
 
The net effect of climate change on nor’easters is likely to be even larger than this atmospheric temperature–moisture relationship suggests, however, as these increases can set off a cascade of effects. "The increased moisture in the storm can also feed back and amplify the storm itself," Trenberth says.
 
No one can conclusively diagnose tonight’s potentially historic nor’easter as a symptom of this phenomenon, but those of us who didn’t stock up on groceries and supplies before the storm may want to start getting into the habit now for future weather events.

Visit our partner Accuweather for storm updates.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe