Nuclear Power Project in Georgia Gets Boost from Feds

The $6.5-billion in loan guarantees from the U.S. Department of Energy comes amid fading hopes for an industry renaissance

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The Department of Energy said on 19 February that it has approved $6.5 billion in loan guarantees for the $14-billion Vogtle nuclear project near Waynesboro, Georgia. The two reactors received regulatory approval in 2012 — the first new US reactors in roughly 30 years.

The announcement came as energy secretary Ernest Moniz reiterated the support of President Barack Obama’s administration for nuclear power as part of its “all-of-the-above” energy strategy to reduce dependence on foreign oil, and as a way to help to reduce US greenhouse-gas emissions. “The President wants to make clear that he sees nuclear energy as part of his carbon-free portfolio,” Moniz said.

These are tricky times for the US nuclear power industry, which faces stiff competition in some regions from natural gas and renewable energy. Market pressures drove the closure of nuclear plants in Vermont and Wisconsin in the past year, and safety and reliability concerns have prompted plants in California and Florida to shutter. Aside from the two reactors under construction at the Vogtle site, only two other reactors have been approved for construction, in South Carolina. Projections from the US Energy Information Administration released in December suggest that US nuclear power generation for electricity will grow by 5% from 2012 to 2040, even as its share of the electricity market is predicted to fall from 19% to 16%.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Utilities are behaving very conservatively right now,” says Doug Vine, a senior fellow at the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions in Arlington, Virginia. That is less true, he notes, in states with regulated electricity markets, such as Georgia and South Carolina, which can set rates that allow power operators to recover the high capital costs of nuclear power plants from consumers.

Elsewhere in the country, the Energy Department’s effort to spur a nuclear renaissance seems to have fizzled. Only a handful of nuclear projects have applied to the Energy Department loan-guarantee program that began in 2005, when backers anticipated a boom in the demand for nuclear energy. The program allows up to $17.5-billion in guarantees in which the government would assume debt if the borrower defaults. “This is probably closing the chapter on the story that started back in 2005,” says Edwin Lyman, a senior scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists in Washington DC. “It’s more or less the end, rather than the beginning.”

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on February 20, 2014.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe