New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Origin of Life: First Cells May Have Been Glued Together

Chainlike molecules stick RNA to a protocell membrane, an essential connection

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Electrostatic interactions induced by short, positively charged, hydrophobic peptides are all it takes to attach RNA to vesicle membranes. The discovery provides new insight into how RNA and membranes could have come together to form protocells – precursors to life – 4 billion years ago on Earth.

RNA is assumed to be the ancestral nucleic acid in early cells because it can store genetic information and also catalyse chemical reactions. Membranes are also thought to have played an important role in prebiotic chemistry, not only trapping nucleic acids inside vesicles but also promoting a variety of processes by co-localising reactants on their surface. The physical association of RNA with vesicle membranes may have been a significant event in early cellular evolution. Determining simple and prebiotically possible ways through which RNA and membranes can associate is therefore an important part of understanding how early cells may have formed.

Nobel laureate Jack Szostak and his team at the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, US, found that peptides just seven amino acids long or fewer can localise RNA to a basic cell membrane. ‘This mechanism is really quite simple and has been used in other fields to form RNA complexes with a variety of materials,’ says Neha Kamat, the first author of the paper. ‘The simplicity of our system is what makes this mode of RNA-membrane association seem plausible on a primitive Earth.’


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The authors used small peptides containing both a hydrophobic group that associates with the membrane and a cationic group that electrostatically interacts with the negatively charged phosphate groups of RNA. Kamat explains that such peptides could have been present on the prebiotic Earth and may have helped to bring RNA and membranes together. ‘The peptides essentially act as a kind of glue to bind membranes and then attract and hold the RNA at the membrane surface,’ she says.

‘The manuscript provides original data, opening a novel branch in origin of life research,’ says Uwe Meierhenrich, who works on prebiotic evolution at the University of Nice, France. ‘The applied experimental techniques have been adapted to both dynamically characterise the vesicles and allow the binding of specific molecules on the vesicular surfaces. This is not a trivial task.’

The authors measured the charge at the surface of the vesicles and performed selective fluorescence resonance energy transfer and microscopy studies to probe RNA-membrane association. Kamat agrees that the most demanding part of the work was to develop suitable assays to do this.

‘The first forms of life were likely to be simple cells containing systems of peptides and short strands of a nucleic acid such as RNA,’ explains David Deamer, a chemist who works on membrane evolution at the University of California, Santa Cruz, US. ‘The results provide significant insight into the way that protocellular systems could have spontaneously assembled on the prebiotic Earth 4 billion years ago, an essential first step toward the origin of cellular life.’

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on Aug 10, 2015.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe