Owl Hearing Relies on Advanced Math

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: ROIAN EGNOR

Even under the cloak of darkness, a mouse that has attracted an owl's attention doesn't stand a chance. Within minutes, the bird swoops down silently and snatches the unsuspecting creature¿an attack made possible by the owl's extraordinarily keen sense of hearing. Researchers knew that the owl's aural sensitivity allowed it to create a two-dimensional map of auditory space. But they may have underestimated the computing capabilities of the neurons that generate this map, according to findings reported today in the journal Science. Whereas most neurons are thought to add incoming signals together to come up with the appropriate neural response, the owl's auditory map neurons appear to multiply.

Previous research had shown that one set of neurons in the owl's auditory system registers the sound level and sound timing differences between the ears, and then sends this information to the auditory map neurons, which lie in a region of the brain stem called the inferious colliculus. But exactly how the map neurons processed the incoming data was unknown. To address this, Jos¿ Luis Pe¿a and Masakazu Konishi of the California Institute of Technology studied the responses of owls exposed to pairs of sounds through headphones. The multiplication model, it turns out, predicted how the neurons respond to various stimuli with about 98 percent accuracy.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Though the researchers may have succeeded in describing the behavior of these neurons mathematically, the neurophysiological underpinnings of such multiplication remain a mystery¿one they hope to unravel in the future.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe