New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Paleontologists Assess T. rex Sue's Pathologies

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Though often depicted as an indomitable killing machine, Tyrannosaurus rex was not immune to trauma and disease. Indeed, the famously complete specimen known as Sue bears a number of pathologies that have long intrigued researchers. Now a new analysis, the results of which were presented last Friday at the annual meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Bozeman, Montana, suggests that Sue suffered from diseases similar to ones that afflict animals today.

In addition to healed fractures in several of the ribs and bone spurs in the backbone and tail, Sue's skeleton shows signs of infection of the lower leg and right upper arm bones and curious holes in the lower jaw. Previously, researchers had attributed the jaw injuries to bite marks. But paleontologists Elizabeth Rega of the Western University of Health Sciences in Pomona, Calif., and Chris Brochu of the University of Iowa report that the shape of the lesions, their distribution pattern, and the fact that similar lesions appear in a number of tyrannosaurid specimens instead hint that they may have resulted from something similar to actiniomycosis, a fungus-like bacteria that infects the bone and soft tissue in the mouths of modern cattle. "The fact that this disease is part of the ecosystem of the mouth in modern affected animals," Rega observes, "further suggests the exciting possibility that a bacterial 'venom' similar to that in the mouths of Komodo dragons may have been present in T. rex as well."

Rega and Brochu note that although Sue's remains bear numerous indications of trauma and disease, this does not indicate that Sue was unhealthy. Rather, they conclude, the beast's maturity and clear evidence of healing indicate that Sue "was a robust individual who successfully survived many insults." The researchers further assert that the manner in which Sue's bones responded to disease has more in common with the approach taken by birds and mammals than by reptiles. This could bolster arguments that T. rex led a metabolically active lifestyle similar to that of today's warm-blooded animals.

"Breathing Life into Tyrannosaurus rex," by Gregory M. Erickson (Scientific American, September 1999), is available for purchase at the Scientific American Archive.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe