Paper Test Quickly Detects Ebola, Dengue and Yellow Fever

Silver nanoparticles on paper reveal three diseases with the speed and simplicity of a home pregnancy test

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Researchers in the US have developed a silver nanoparticle-based paper test to simultaneously detect dengue, yellow fever and Ebola. This could provide a cheap and reliable diagnosis for all three diseases, that’s as quick as a home pregnancy test.

The Ebola epidemic in West Africa underscores an urgent need for rapid diagnostics; quick identification and patient isolation can benefit the sick and the healthy. However, dengue, yellow fever and Ebola all initially manifest as a fever and headache, so are easily mixed up.

Now, this huge problem has a tiny solution – an 8×3cm lateral flow test. Lee Gehrke and his team at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard Medical School adapted the traditional single marker lateral flow test to diagnose several diseases at once. It costs $2, takes 10 minutes, and there is no need for a power supply, trained specialist or expensive equipment.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The test is made from strips of paper containing antibodies attached to triangular silver nanoparticles of varying size according to the disease they recognize and bind to. Silver nanoparticles appear as different colours according to their size, so when a patient’s serum sample migrates through the device, distinctive colored lines appear on the paper to indicate positive results for Ebola, dengue or yellow fever. This pattern of lines can be analysed by eye but the team are also working on a mobile phone application to aid diagnosis. ‘An app could be very useful for diseases that are mosquito-spread,’ says Gehrke. ‘It adds a date and geographical stamp to the test results so the spread of disease can be followed in real-time.’

Warren Chan, an expert in nanomaterials-based diagnostics at the University of Toronto in Canada, sees the research as an exciting step forward: ‘They have solved the immense problem of detecting multiple disease targets at the same time. The next step will be to clinically validate the technology.’

Gehrke’s team are now testing the device in both field and clinical studies, and plan to adapt it to diagnose a wider range of viruses. 

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on February 17, 2015

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe