New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Paper Test Quickly Detects Ebola, Dengue and Yellow Fever

Silver nanoparticles on paper reveal three diseases with the speed and simplicity of a home pregnancy test

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Researchers in the US have developed a silver nanoparticle-based paper test to simultaneously detect dengue, yellow fever and Ebola. This could provide a cheap and reliable diagnosis for all three diseases, that’s as quick as a home pregnancy test.

The Ebola epidemic in West Africa underscores an urgent need for rapid diagnostics; quick identification and patient isolation can benefit the sick and the healthy. However, dengue, yellow fever and Ebola all initially manifest as a fever and headache, so are easily mixed up.

Now, this huge problem has a tiny solution – an 8×3cm lateral flow test. Lee Gehrke and his team at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard Medical School adapted the traditional single marker lateral flow test to diagnose several diseases at once. It costs $2, takes 10 minutes, and there is no need for a power supply, trained specialist or expensive equipment.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The test is made from strips of paper containing antibodies attached to triangular silver nanoparticles of varying size according to the disease they recognize and bind to. Silver nanoparticles appear as different colours according to their size, so when a patient’s serum sample migrates through the device, distinctive colored lines appear on the paper to indicate positive results for Ebola, dengue or yellow fever. This pattern of lines can be analysed by eye but the team are also working on a mobile phone application to aid diagnosis. ‘An app could be very useful for diseases that are mosquito-spread,’ says Gehrke. ‘It adds a date and geographical stamp to the test results so the spread of disease can be followed in real-time.’

Warren Chan, an expert in nanomaterials-based diagnostics at the University of Toronto in Canada, sees the research as an exciting step forward: ‘They have solved the immense problem of detecting multiple disease targets at the same time. The next step will be to clinically validate the technology.’

Gehrke’s team are now testing the device in both field and clinical studies, and plan to adapt it to diagnose a wider range of viruses. 

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on February 17, 2015

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe