New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Plan Abandoned for Close Search This Month for Lost Comet Lander

The Rosetta comet orbiter will continue its planned course which rules out making a special trip to find Philae

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The European Space Agency's Rosetta spacecraft will not make a dedicated flyby to search for the lost comet lander Philae any time soon, according to a post on the agency's Rosetta blog.

It has been almost three months since European Space Agency (ESA) scientists heard the last peep from Philae, which went silent when its batteries ran out just days after its bumpy November 12 landing on comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko. Amateur and professional planetary scientists have scoured pictures of 67P looking for signs of the lost lander, but its exact location remains a mystery.

Last month, mission scientists debated changing the manoeuvres that had long been planned for Rosetta, Philae's parent craft, which is currently orbiting 67P. Some hoped to switch Rosetta's trajectory to launch a search for the lander from a distance of just 6 kilometers above the comet (see 'Hunt for Philae hangs in the balance'). But on January 30, ESA said that Rosetta would continue on its planned course.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The team will stick with plans to fly over the body of the duck-shaped comet on February 14, away from Philae, which is resting somewhere on the duck's head. Rosetta's swoop at 6 km should generate bright, shadow-free images and high-resolution data about the comet's composition, and will allow the orbiter to sample the comet's atmosphere from up close.

Awakening ahead?
The scientists may yet get a glimpse of Philae. If Rosetta travels close to the likely location of the lander on one of its future scheduled flybys and if there is time, the team could take images of the area, said ESA’s Rosetta project scientist, Matt Taylor, writing on the Rosetta blogThese may reveal clues about the lander’s location, but would not be taken at optimum distance or illumination.

Fred Jansen, Rosetta mission manager at ESA, says that there was unlikely to be another opportunity for a dedicated lander search until later in the mission, possibly next year.

He admits that some scientists were disappointed at the decision not to look for Philae. But there were good reasons why it was not possible, he says. Overhauling the planned trajectory would be immensely complex and labour intensive, and a flyby would not be guaranteed to image the right area anyway. Travelling close to the comet, Rosetta would be buffeted by gas streaming off the surface. Combined with its high speed, this would leave considerable uncertainty in the craft's position. “There is a reasonable chance that you would not look at the correct place,” says Jansen.

On the basis of images of Philae's initial bounce and using data from the radio instrument CONSERT, the lander's possible location has been narrowed down to a strip measuring around 200 meters by 20 meters. In images taken at 18 km above the comet's surface, the lander would appear just three pixels wide. Photos taken by the lander and beamed back during its 64 hours of battery life suggest that it is in a craggy shaded spot, at the base of a cliff.

This means that Philae is not currently getting enough solar energy to power itself. But as comet 67P approaches the Sun, Philae may wake up and tell Rosetta where it is. Assuming that the lander has survived the cold, the earliest it might wake is in late March, says ESA. But it is more likely to happen in May or June, when the Sun will be directly above the lander's possible location, giving Philae a better chance of receiving the solar power that it needs to reboot.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on February 3, 2015.

Elizabeth Gibney is a senior physics reporter for Nature magazine.

More by Elizabeth Gibney

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe