New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Playgrounds Are Not All Created Equally

The type of school yard affects how much children exercise

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Kids should exercise at least one hour a day, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But in the U.S., less than half of six- to 11-year-olds and only 8 percent of 12- to 19-year-olds meet that target. Schools help to promote physical activity, with recess accounting for up to 40 percent of a child's daily exercise needs. So how exactly do kids spend that welcome break from their desks?

Over in Denmark, a longitudinal study of how schoolchildren move through urban environments provided an opportunity to find out by outfitting hundreds of students with accelerometers and GPS trackers during their waking hours. Henriette Bondo Andersen, a research assistant in the department of sports science and clinical biomechanics at the University of Southern Denmark, used some of the collected data to analyze how children spent their recess time and whether various school yards—including those made up of grassy areas, playgrounds or asphalt lots—influenced activity levels.

The researchers found that children were significantly more active when playing on grassy areas and at sites featuring playground equipment. Concrete lots elicited the least energy expenditure, and in all five areas studied, girls spent more time being sedentary than boys. The findings (below) were published this month in Landscape and Urban Planning.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Insights into which schoolyard elements work best to promote physical activity could help developers around the world create more exercise-friendly spaces. “We're working with seven schools that are renovating their playgrounds by adding dancing, climbing, skating and trampoline areas,” Andersen says. “The goal is to make it so kids can more easily choose to be active.”

Scientific American Magazine Vol 312 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Fit for Play” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 312 No. 2 (), p. 24
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0215-24

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe