What Would Make You Buy a Smartwatch?

Brilliant crowdsourced ideas that just might make these new tech accessories worth it

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As I wrote in my Scientific American column this month, the early smartwatches aren't exactly flying off store shelves. Clearly, something's wrong—with the design, the price, the features or the concept itself. Or all of the above.

Maybe, therefore, someone should poll the public. Someone should ask them what features a smartwatch should have.

That's exactly what I did. I asked my Twitter followers (I'm @pogue) a simple question: "The first smartwatches don't seem to offer features people want. Crowdsourcing moment: What functions SHOULD a smartwatch offer?"


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Herewith, some of the most intriguing responses:‏

Payments, of course!—@TheDigitalJen

Should yell at you when you're going to be late, based on calendar and GPS info.—‏@russbengtson

A mirror screen to check my teeth for spinach.—@TheGirlPie

A smartwatch should offer the ability to act as a second-factor authentication to log you into your phone, tablet or PC.—‏@rbrock

The only real benefit of a watch is it touches your skin all day long. So the Q is: What can you do with that? Health monitoring.—‏@BoschsPoodle

Number one, it shouldn't make my wrist sweat like crazy. Number two, it shouldn't shatter if I bump it into a wall.—@GaryMWatson

Time, date, slim, analog dial, seamless sync w/all apps, video chat, Bluetooth voice commands, GPS, camera, 5-year battery.—‏@wmecke

It's easier to ask Q from wrist rather than pulling out your phone. So, it could be a Siri portal for your phone.—‏@mamatastic

Well, watch designers seem to like square forms, but I think round is best. Think of a clickable dial on the edge, like the first iPods.—‏@rtietz

I'm going to go out on a limb and say no one really wants a smart watch.... It's technology overkill.—‏@petechod

GPS. Air thermometer. Health monitoring. Phone. Ability to drive KITT from Knight Rider.—‏@javaonline

Solar-power charging.—@yorkiebar16

A pulse detector that notifies relatives if it stops. I don't want to be found days later if I pass alone. Fear of mine.—‏@pulrich

Let's start with not requiring a recharge every day. I thought we solved that with kinetic-powered watches already….—@VirtualTal

Apps. The ability to morph the watch depending on the use. ‏@emiliocarlock

An FM radio chip, please.—@WayneCabot

Maybe a Pez dispenser.—‏@joeuelk

Tell time...and maybe the date.—‏@Cfountain72

People will know what they want as soon as Apple tells them—when it releases the iWatch.—@MendzappJames

David Pogue is the anchor columnist for Yahoo Tech and host of several NOVA miniseries on PBS.

More by David Pogue
Scientific American Magazine Vol 310 Issue 6This article was published with the title “What Would Make You Buy a Smartwatch?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 310 No. 6 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican062014-6gLLwZsI1Y5B4Jh5SxgtJw

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe