New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Rebooted Kepler Spacecraft Hauls in the Planets

Fresh worlds found by K2 mission push beyond original discoveries

This artistic impression shows NASA's planet-hunting Kepler spacecraft operating in a new mission profile called K2.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In the second phase of its life as a planet hunter, NASA’s Kepler spacecraft is raking in exoplanet discoveries that are surprisingly different from those found during its first iteration.

Between 2009 and 2013, Kepler became the most successful planet-hunting machine ever, discovering at least 1,030 planets and more than 4,600 possible others in a single patch of sky. When a mechanical failure stripped the spacecraft of its ability to point precisely among the stars, engineers reinvented it in 2014 as the K2 mission, which looks at different parts of the cosmos for shorter periods of time.

In its first year of observing, K2 has netted more than 100 confirmed exoplanets, says astronomer Ian Crossfield at the University of Arizona in Tucson. They include a surprising number of systems in which more than one planet orbits the same star. The K2 planets are also orbiting hotter stars than are many of the Kepler discoveries.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“This is really showing the power and potential of K2,” says Crossfield. “These are things we never found with four years of Kepler data.” He and other scientists reported the findings this week at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Kissimmee, Florida.

The original Kepler mission was designed to answer a specific question: what fraction of Sun-like stars have Earth-size planets around them? Unbound by those constraints—even if not as good at pointing itself—K2 has been able to explore wider questions of planetary origin and evolution. “Now we get to look at a much bigger variety,” says Steve Howell, the mission’s project scientist at NASA’s Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California.

And because K2 looks at stars that are generally brighter and closer to Earth than Kepler did, the exoplanets that the mission finds are likely to be the best studied for the foreseeable future. This is because they are near enough to allow astronomers to explore them with other telescopes on Earth and in space.

Unexpected bounty
In the past year, K2 has uncovered not just planets—such as three super-Earths around a single star—but also surprises such as the disintegrating remains of a planet swirling around a white dwarf star. It has even probed exploding stars—because K2 stares constantly at a patch of the sky, it is able to catch a supernova as it brightens instead of later in its explosion, as other telescopes typically do.

Among the K2 planets confirmed so far, 58 are singletons, 28 come from systems with at least two planets and 14 are triples, Crossfield says. In addition, K2 has unearthed more than 200 candidate planets, says Andrew Vanderburg, an astronomer at the Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

K2 observes a larger fraction of the cool stars known as M dwarfs—the most common type of star in the Galaxy—than Kepler did. But surprisingly, fewer of the K2 planets are orbiting M dwarf stars. A higher percentage of them, at least so far, circle stars that are hotter and more like the Sun, says Courtney Dressing, an astronomer at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in Pasadena.

K2 will begin a new type of planet-hunting on April 7. Normally the spacecraft searches for a temporary dimming of a star caused when a planet crosses in front of it. For just under three months, however, it will look for the temporary brightening of cosmic objects, such as a galaxy, caused when a planet bends light as it crosses the line of sight between it and the observer. The team expects to catch between 85 and 120 of these ‘microlensing’ planets during the campaign.

The survey will involve other telescopes and be the first automated search to be done simultaneously from the ground and in space, says Calen Henderson, an astronomer at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California.

That means much more work ahead for mission scientists. “Kepler was one field and it ruined your summer,” says Caltech astronomer David Ciardi. “K2 is ruining our whole year.”

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on January 7, 2016.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe