Relativity's Reach [Interactive Graphic]

A visualization of recent physics terms affirms the enduring influence of Einstein’s 100-year-old masterpiece. Give it a try

By The Editors

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The outer limits of 21st-century physics involve arcane pursuits with strange and wonderful names like M-theory and the de Sitter universe. Many of these endeavors rely heavily on Albert Einstein’s explanation of how gravity emerges from the bending of spacetime.

With the assistance of The Office for Creative Research (OCR), a New York City data visualization firm, Scientific American decided to look for some measure of how often recent scientific papers in relevant areas of physics still lean on Einstein’s 100-year-old achievement.

OCR examined a year’s worth of the physics literature for references to general relativity or its conceptual offshoots. Specifically, OCR processed 2,435 abstracts of 2014 physics papers from the arXiv.org repository via a powerful text-analysis program incorporated into IBM’s Watson AI system. The software extracted keywords that turned up repeatedly in abstracts from a section of arXiv on general relativity and quantum cosmology. We then edited this list down to 61 keywords, each of which represents a research topic that has grown out of general relativity. The program then scanned arXiv’s relativity section to discover which of the 61 words were turning up most often in the research reports.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

The data visualization here is the result. Each incandescent colored dot stands for a paper that touches on at least one element of general relativity or its spin-offs [click on "Tour" for details on how to interpret the visualization].

It is apparent at a glance that Einstein’s ideas are still going strong. Thousands of papers published every year make reference to his progeny. General relativity seems certain to continue to be a cornerstone of physics in decades to come. When we redo this data visualization 100 years from now, we are betting that it will yield the same pointillist explosion of color.

*For best results, please view in Google Chrome.

Click this link to launch the visualization fullscreen.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American