New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Researchers Are Building a Tear Bank to Better Understand Why We Weep

Scientists will eventually be able to select tears by age and gender from the cryogenic repository

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Compared with other bodily excretions, tears are vastly understudied. Collecting the salty drops is tedious—weepy donors are rare, men hardly ever sign up and tears must be “fresh” for their makeup to be properly analyzed. As a result, researchers lack a consensus about the purpose of a basic human behavior. Is crying a primal way to communicate that many species share, as some chemists hypothesize? Or is it, as psychologists have put forth, a uniquely human key to social bonding? Israeli neurobiologist Noam Sobel has a plan to advance the field: he has perfected a way to flash-freeze tears and is now working to create a “tear bank” for researchers around the world.

Sobel, who is based at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, discovered in 2011 that women's tears contain pheromones that lower the testosterone levels of nearby men. But building on that research has been slow because the molecules easily degrade.

To keep the chemical composition of tears intact, Sobel and his team have developed a way to systematically freeze the droplets. The method involves liquid nitrogen, which rapidly lowers the temperature of a sample below −80 degrees Celsius. The process preserves most of the tears' chemicals, say the researchers, who plan to publish their results later this year. Next they will start building a cryogenic repository of tears, categorized by source and orderable online. “Just as other biobanks exist for amniotic fluid, blood and urine, we'll have a biobank of tears,” Sobel says. “This would let you do studies in two weeks instead of six months.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A tear bank for research “has tremendous possibilities,” says Saad Bhamla, a bioengineer at Stanford University who often has to use animal tears in his own investigations into how tears create a film on the eye. As examples of applications, he points to Silicon Valley's interest in contact lenses that double as a heads-up display, among other functions, and the rising cases of dry eyes from prolonged sessions of staring at a computer screen.

Sobel hopes interested researchers will eventually be able to select tears by age and gender from the repository—say, 200 samples from white males, 18 to 25 years old. This customized access could expedite experiments tackling the chemistry of crying's many unanswered questions: Do tears affect mood or appetite? Do the tears of men and women differ? How do emotional and nonemotional tears—from, say, cutting onions—compare? For Sobel, the more people who cry their eyes out, the better.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe