Risky Bedding Common for Babies in U.S.

More than half of U.S. parents say their babies sleep with pillows, blankets and other loose bedding despite recommendations against their use from doctors and health officials

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Andrew M. Seaman

(Reuters Health) - More than half of U.S. parents say their babies sleep with pillows, blankets and other loose bedding despite recommendations against their use from doctors and health officials, according to a new government study.

Removing loose bedding from a baby’s sleeping environment is one way to reduce their risk of suffocation and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), write the researchers, who are from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“We have little understanding of how many infants in the U.S. are put into sleeping environments where soft bedding or blankets may be used,” said Carrie Shapiro-Mendoza, the study’s lead author and senior scientist in the CDC’s Division of Reproductive Health in Atlanta.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that babies be put to sleep on their backs on a firm sleep surface free of soft objects, including pillows, blankets and bumpers. Those recommendations are echoed by the “Safe to Sleep” program from the National Institutes of Health.

“The danger is that thick blankets, quilt or pillows can obstruct the baby’s airway, which would keep them from being able to breathe,” Shapiro-Mendoza said in a phone interview.

Recommendations about safe sleeping were first made in the mid-1990s. The researchers write in the journal Pediatrics that the rate of SIDS declined between 2000 and 2010. Meanwhile, the rate of sleep-related suffocation more than doubled from 7 cases per 100,000 newborns to about 16 per 100,000.

For the new study, the researchers used data on children younger than eight months, collected from 1993 to 2010 as part of the National Infant Sleep Position study.

The researchers write that about 86 percent of parents reported putting their babies to sleep with loose bedding between 1993 and 1995. That figure fell to about 55 percent between 2008 and 2010.

During the most recent period, the researchers found, teenage mothers and mothers with less than a high school education were most likely to use loose bedding.

“It can be tricky for parents because they might see magazine and other images where they see babies with blanket and pillows,” said Shapiro-Mendoza. “This may reinforce the idea that these activities are safe and that’s the norm.”

“Parents are really well intentioned,” she said. “They want to provide warmth and comfort to the baby, but all the baby really needs is infant sleep clothing.”

Baby sleep clothing keeps babies warm and does not entrap the child, she said.

Another recent study found about one in eight sudden and sleep-related deaths among infants occur when they're put to sleep on sofas (see Reuters Health story of October 13, 2014 here: http://reut.rs/1HGizPw).

Shapiro-Mendoza said parents need to know that the safest place for babies is on their backs on a firm mattress that's covered with a fitted sheet.

“There’s no need for other bedding,” she said, adding that people can get more information from their pediatricians and the “Safe to Sleep” website (http://1.usa.gov/1HGgZNA).

SOURCE: http://bit.ly/uFc4g2 Pediatrics, online December 1, 2014.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe