New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Safer Antifreeze Made from Food Additive and Nanoparticles

Toxic chemical can be replaced by a fluid of propylene glycol and small metal particles

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Replacing toxic ethylene glycol—the principal component of antifreezes and de-icers—with the food additive propylene glycol, and adding nanoparticles to improve the mixture’s properties, researchers at US company ACTA Technologyhave created an antifreeze formula that they say is safer, more environmentally friendly and performs better than existing products.

Although poisonous, ethylene glycol has a sweet taste and every year thousands of people, many of them children, and countless pets and wild animals, are poisoned by accidentally drinking antifreeze. Propylene glycol, on the other hand, is safe to consume, and is used as an additive in some foods to keep them moist. It is already used as an antifreeze in some industries such as food production, but its viscous, syrup-like consistency makes it unsuitable for widespread use.

‘Our goal was to create a non-toxic heat transfer fluid that overcomes the traditional limitations of a propylene glycol-water mix,’ says Michael Minard, ACTA’s chief executive, speaking at the 249th ACS National Meeting & Exposition in Denver, US. Adding metal oxide nanoparticles to the mixture reduces its viscosity, he explains. ‘One of the properties we see is shear-thinning which reduces the viscosity substantially.’


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Other researchers working on ‘nanofluids’ like this have struggled with viscosity, adds ACTA’s chief technology officer Edward Clancy, because they use surfactants to stop the nanoparticles sticking together. The nanoparticles that ACTA use, however, are stable without surfactant because of their positive charge and non-spherical, branched chain structure. ‘Because we’re not bound by using a surfactant we’re not paying the viscosity penalty that so many of our predecessors have stumbled into,’ says Clancy.

The resulting solution is not only non-toxic, but may actually be more effective as antifreeze, with nearly double the heat transfer capacity of ethylene glycol-based formulations. ‘The thermal conductivity of these metallic [nanoparticles] is much higher than that of the base fluid, so if you put them in you increase the overall heat transfer,’ Clancy explains.

ACTA have patented their antifreeze and are currently investigating ways to scale up production. Minard says the overall cost of making it will be ‘near to or lower than’ ethylene glycol antifreezes, and they are optimistic it will be reach the market within a few years. ‘We believe that the finished product will have a wide variety of uses in various industries,’ says Minard.

Consultant toxicologist John Hoskins, who was not involved in the research, says replacing ethylene glycol with propylene glycol is, on the whole, a positive step that would reduce poisonings, but points out that the environmental impacts of any new formula must be considered, as well as toxicity. ‘In the environment ethylene glycol degrades more quickly than propylene glycol,’ he says. ‘[And in existing products] ethylene glycol is more effective at depressing the freezing point, so more propylene glycol may needed in antifreeze to achieve the same effect.’

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on March 26, 2015.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe