New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Scientists Identify Gene That Marks Deadliest Form of Prostate Cancer

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Nearly 30,000 men die each year from prostate cancer that has spread to other organs of the body. Being able to predict whether the disease is likely to spread, or metastasize, in a particular patient would help doctors design a better course of treatment. To that end, research published today in the journal Nature could help. Scientists report that high levels of activity in a gene known as EXH2 mark the most aggressive cancer cells.

Arul M. Chinnaiyan of the University of Michigan Medical School and his colleagues utilized DNA microarrays to assess the activity of genes in both localized and metastatic prostate cancer. They found 55 genes that exhibited greater activity in the metastatic samples than in the localized cases. The most pronounced difference, the team found, was in EZH2. (The image at left shows prostate cancer cells stained for EZH2 protein (left) and DNA microarray data (right). Red squares identify genes that are active in metastatic prostate cancer, while green squares indicate genes that are repressed.)

The scientists next analyzed more than 1,000 prostate samples (including cancerous tissue, tissue with benign cell changes and normal tissue) to measure levels of the EZH2 protein. They found that the amount of EZH2 protein produced increased as the disease advanced. Says study co-author Mark A. Rubin of Brigham and Women's Hospital, "We found EZH2 protein expression to be significantly better at predicting clinical outcome than any other factor." Chinnaiyan notes, however, that "at this point, it's unclear whether the gene plays a role in cancer's development or is simply an indicator of lethal progression."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe