Scientists Identify Gene That Marks Deadliest Form of Prostate Cancer

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Nearly 30,000 men die each year from prostate cancer that has spread to other organs of the body. Being able to predict whether the disease is likely to spread, or metastasize, in a particular patient would help doctors design a better course of treatment. To that end, research published today in the journal Nature could help. Scientists report that high levels of activity in a gene known as EXH2 mark the most aggressive cancer cells.

Arul M. Chinnaiyan of the University of Michigan Medical School and his colleagues utilized DNA microarrays to assess the activity of genes in both localized and metastatic prostate cancer. They found 55 genes that exhibited greater activity in the metastatic samples than in the localized cases. The most pronounced difference, the team found, was in EZH2. (The image at left shows prostate cancer cells stained for EZH2 protein (left) and DNA microarray data (right). Red squares identify genes that are active in metastatic prostate cancer, while green squares indicate genes that are repressed.)

The scientists next analyzed more than 1,000 prostate samples (including cancerous tissue, tissue with benign cell changes and normal tissue) to measure levels of the EZH2 protein. They found that the amount of EZH2 protein produced increased as the disease advanced. Says study co-author Mark A. Rubin of Brigham and Women's Hospital, "We found EZH2 protein expression to be significantly better at predicting clinical outcome than any other factor." Chinnaiyan notes, however, that "at this point, it's unclear whether the gene plays a role in cancer's development or is simply an indicator of lethal progression."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe