New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Scientists Reassess Carbon Sink Inventories

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Carbon sinks¿among them plants and the soil¿bind the carbon from carbon dioxide (CO2) in our atmosphere. In doing so, they play a vital role in counterbalancing the effects of man-made CO2 emissions. But exactly how much carbon these sinks bind¿and so the true threat of global warming¿is difficult to determine. Researchers can measure carbon sinks either by tracking carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere or by taking inventory of trees in the forests. Unfortunately, these methods have produced dramatically different results in the past. A study published in today's Science, though, tries to close the gap by combining an extensive land-based survey of the continental U.S. with findings obtained from 27 different atmospheric studies.

The new analysis concludes that trees and other plant matter took up one third to two thirds of a billion tons of carbon each year between 1980 and 1989. This final number lies below earlier estimates from atmospheric tests and above land-based figures, which did not take into account such carbon sinks as woody debris, forest litter and soil.

The researchers point out that much of the carbon that soil and plants are absorbing now was released earlier in the century. "When we chopped down the forests, we released carbon trapped in the trees into the atmosphere," says lead author Stephen Pacala of Princeton University. "When we plowed up the prairies, we released carbon from the grasslands and soils into the atmosphere. Now the ecosystem is taking some of it back."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The sinks won't absorb the greenhouse gas forever, though. Pacala estimates that they will gradually stop binding carbon over the next 50 to 100 years. Even now, they cannot compensate for the 1.4 billion tons of carbon released into the atmosphere each year through the burning of fossil fuels in the U.S. "The carbon sinks are going to decrease at the same time as our fossil fuel emissions increase," Pacala says. "The greenhouse problem is going to get worse faster than we expected."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe