Scientists Reassess Carbon Sink Inventories

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Carbon sinks¿among them plants and the soil¿bind the carbon from carbon dioxide (CO2) in our atmosphere. In doing so, they play a vital role in counterbalancing the effects of man-made CO2 emissions. But exactly how much carbon these sinks bind¿and so the true threat of global warming¿is difficult to determine. Researchers can measure carbon sinks either by tracking carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere or by taking inventory of trees in the forests. Unfortunately, these methods have produced dramatically different results in the past. A study published in today's Science, though, tries to close the gap by combining an extensive land-based survey of the continental U.S. with findings obtained from 27 different atmospheric studies.

The new analysis concludes that trees and other plant matter took up one third to two thirds of a billion tons of carbon each year between 1980 and 1989. This final number lies below earlier estimates from atmospheric tests and above land-based figures, which did not take into account such carbon sinks as woody debris, forest litter and soil.

The researchers point out that much of the carbon that soil and plants are absorbing now was released earlier in the century. "When we chopped down the forests, we released carbon trapped in the trees into the atmosphere," says lead author Stephen Pacala of Princeton University. "When we plowed up the prairies, we released carbon from the grasslands and soils into the atmosphere. Now the ecosystem is taking some of it back."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The sinks won't absorb the greenhouse gas forever, though. Pacala estimates that they will gradually stop binding carbon over the next 50 to 100 years. Even now, they cannot compensate for the 1.4 billion tons of carbon released into the atmosphere each year through the burning of fossil fuels in the U.S. "The carbon sinks are going to decrease at the same time as our fossil fuel emissions increase," Pacala says. "The greenhouse problem is going to get worse faster than we expected."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe