New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Scores of Museum Specimens Carry a Name That Isn't Theirs

A new study estimates at least half of plants in herbaria may be mislabeled—and the problem could extend to other collections, too

Thomas Fuchs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A certain French rose by any other name may smell as sweet, but fragrance aside, its scientific name is Rosa gallica—and that's the name it should bear in botanical collections. Yet more than half of plant specimens tucked away in herbaria may be mislabeled, and the problem could extend to other types of collections, too, according to a study published in Current Biology.

To examine how pervasive mislabeling can be, researchers at the University of Oxford and the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh analyzed the tags on 4,500 specimens of African ginger and more than 49,000 specimens of morning glories as case studies. “We found at least half of the names associated with those specimens were synonyms or illegitimate names,” says botanist Robert Scotland.

The errant nomenclature most likely arises when biologists and collections managers classify samples of a species without conferring with colleagues at other institutions. In other cases, a sample may be designated by its genus alone if its species name initially is unspecified or undetermined—a simplification that Scotland's team counted as incorrect. And although the researchers think the problem is more prevalent in collections of plants than in those of vertebrate animals, they suspect that misplaced monikers run rampant through insect stockpiles as well.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Some experts, including Barbara Thiers, director of New York Botanical Garden's William & Lynda Steere Herbarium, think the one-half estimate for plants is an exaggeration. But both Thiers and Scotland agree that insufficient financial support for collections management makes consistently accurate categorization of thousands on thousands of specimens a daunting task. Group efforts, such as the online databases The Plant List, FishNet and ZooBank, could help tackle the situation.

Why all the fuss? Wrong names can interfere with research on a particular organism and hinder conservation efforts. “If we don't know the right names to use for plants or animals,” Thiers says, “there's no way we'll be able to save them.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe