New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Sea Sponge Inspires Better Fiber-Optic Cables

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Technologically speaking, the latest fiber-optic cables have nothing on a small deep-sea sponge. Scientists report today in the journal Nature that the so-called glass sponge Euplectella contains outgrowths that are similar in structure to fiber-optic cables but much less likely to break.

Euplectella is commonly called the "Venus flower-basket" because its silica skeleton forms an intricate cage, which often houses a pair of mating shrimp. Tiny projections known as spicules extend from the base of the structure (see arrow in image). These spicules are similar in size to conventional fiber-optic cable and made from the same material. When Joanna Aizenberg of Bell Laboratories/Lucent Technologies and her colleagues tested their optical properties they found that the sponge parts had a comparable index of refraction to man-made cables and would thus be equally good at transmitting information. Moreover, the spicules are surprisingly resistant to breakage, which is a problem for telecommunication wires. "You can tie a knot in this fiber [a spicule] and it doesn't break," Aizenberg notes.

The natural fibers are also advantageous because Euplectella forms them at ambient temperatures. Manufacture of fiber-optic cables, in contrast, must take place at high temperatures, which makes it difficult to add specialized impurities that could improve the light-guiding properties of the cable. (These added dopants are subsequently removed during cooling in a process called devitrification.) Euplectella, the authors conclude, should "shed light on low-temperature, biologically inspired processes that could give rise to better fiber-optical materials and networks."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe