Sea Sponge Inspires Better Fiber-Optic Cables

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Technologically speaking, the latest fiber-optic cables have nothing on a small deep-sea sponge. Scientists report today in the journal Nature that the so-called glass sponge Euplectella contains outgrowths that are similar in structure to fiber-optic cables but much less likely to break.

Euplectella is commonly called the "Venus flower-basket" because its silica skeleton forms an intricate cage, which often houses a pair of mating shrimp. Tiny projections known as spicules extend from the base of the structure (see arrow in image). These spicules are similar in size to conventional fiber-optic cable and made from the same material. When Joanna Aizenberg of Bell Laboratories/Lucent Technologies and her colleagues tested their optical properties they found that the sponge parts had a comparable index of refraction to man-made cables and would thus be equally good at transmitting information. Moreover, the spicules are surprisingly resistant to breakage, which is a problem for telecommunication wires. "You can tie a knot in this fiber [a spicule] and it doesn't break," Aizenberg notes.

The natural fibers are also advantageous because Euplectella forms them at ambient temperatures. Manufacture of fiber-optic cables, in contrast, must take place at high temperatures, which makes it difficult to add specialized impurities that could improve the light-guiding properties of the cable. (These added dopants are subsequently removed during cooling in a process called devitrification.) Euplectella, the authors conclude, should "shed light on low-temperature, biologically inspired processes that could give rise to better fiber-optical materials and networks."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe