New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Sensational Sucker: The Neural Complexity of the Octopus Organ

The octopus sucker can feel, taste, grip, manipulate—and act of its own accord

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


At first glance, an octopus’s sucker looks like the simple suction cup that tips a toy dart or affixes a GPS to the windshield. In fact, it is a remarkably sophisticated organ that not only can attach to objects with varying degrees of force but also can maneuver them, thanks to specialized muscle groups.

The sucker has two chambers: the outer infun­dibu­lum and inner acetabulum. When it attaches to an object—a tasty clam, for instance—the muscles of the infundibulum reshape the sucker rim to conform to the shell surface, forming a seal. The muscles of the acetabulum then contract, producing intense negative pressure inside the water-filled interior of the sucker relative to the external seawater. This pressure differential generates suction. The more the muscles of the acetabulum contract, the higher the negative pressure and the firmer the sucker’s grip. So-called extrinsic muscles, meanwhile, permit the sucker rim to rotate the object in a full circle at a shallow or steep angle to the arm without breaking the seal or reducing the pressure differential.

In addition to their complex musculature, oc­to­pus suckers possess elaborate neural circuitry. Specialized neurons called chemoreceptors stud the sucker rim, enabling it to taste surfaces. Along with mech­an­o­receptors and proprioceptors—which relay information about touch and pressure and about muscle activity, respectively—these chemoreceptors feed into a bundle of neurons called a ganglion that appears to function as the sucker’s own mini “brain,” receiving sensory input and organizing coherent responses. Because the sucker ganglia are connected to one another through a chain of larger brachial ganglia running the length of the arm that control arm movements, neighboring suckers can coordinate their movements without relying on constant direction from the actual brain—to pass an object up or down the length of the arm, for example. Exactly how the brain and the arm and sucker ganglia divvy up neural responsibilities re­­mains to be determined. 

Scientific American Magazine Vol 303 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Sensational Sucker: The Neural Complexity of the Octopus Organ” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 303 No. 4 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican102010-7JT9Aco0Gmn5z1EwXlOCJL

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe