New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Sensor Turns Faintest Radio Waves into Laser Signals

The supersensitive device holds promise for medical imaging and quantum networks

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Physicists have found a way to detect faint radio waves and convert them directly into signals that can be transmitted by fiber optics. The discovery could improve the sensitivity of detectors used in magnetic resonance imaging and radio astronomy, and help to connect future quantum computers into a network.

Radio-wave receivers use antennas to pick up radiation. The incoming waves resonate with the antenna and induce a changing electrical signal, which is then transmitted down a wire. Faint radio signals must be boosted by electrical amplifiers such as transistors, which introduce noise — extra fluctuations that, when amplified, can swamp the signal. The amount of noise present sets the limit of the detector’s sensitivity: The best amplifiers must be super-cooled to reduce the thermal vibrations that cause noise.

A team led by physicist Eugene Polzik at the University of Copenhagen’s Niels Bohr Institute has now created a detector that can turn radio signals into optical signals at room temperature, without the need to go through amplification. The device is already as sensitive as state-of-the-art electronics, says Polzik. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Up and down
The key to the approach, described in Nature, is a membrane of silicon nitride less than 200 nanometers thick, coated with aluminium and suspended over a gold plate. When an antenna picks up a radio signal, it creates an oscillating electrical signal in the circuit. This produces a voltage flicking back and forth between the aluminium and the gold, and the resulting attracting and repelling electrostatic forces cause the membrane to move in tune with the wave.

The device detects this motion by bouncing a laser off the membrane and measuring how the motion shifts the laser's light waves, explains co-author Albert Schliesser, also a physicist at the Niels Bohr Institute. This laser signal can be read out, and its accuracy is limited only by quantum fluctuations of the laser light, he says. Tests show that noise from the membrane is tiny: even at room temperature, the membrane adds 100 times less noise than super-cooled electronic amplifiers, says Schliesser.

Previous experiments have succeeded in converting radio-frequency signals into mechanical vibrations, and in turning mechanical vibrations into light signals, but Schliesser and his colleagues have combined both into a single system.

Cosmic signals
Such low-noise conversion could find applications in radio telescopes, says Polzik: in particular on satellites, where cryogenic cooling is difficult. His team's device could help astronomers to “look at the sky and try to catch the tiniest signals from the cosmic background radiation”, he says. With further improvements, Schliesser says they could also apply the device to "deliver the clearest MRI scans ever seen".

Tero Heikkilä, a physicist at the University of Jyväskylä in Finland, says that the device could also be useful in the emerging fields of quantum computing and quantum cryptography, where information is carried by quantum bits, or qubits, made of photons or other systems that can encode two values at once. As a radio-to-optical converter, the device could enable computers working on radio-frequencies to send their quantum information down optical fibers. “The idea would be to make ‘flying qubits’ — photons — which would communicate and transfer information between two quantum computers working at radio frequencies,” says Heikkilä.

Francesco Massel, another physicist at the University of Jyväskylä, warns that the system is currently too inefficient for most applications: it successfully converts radio photons to optical light just 0.8% of the time. However, the set up is "definitely promising", he adds. “It is a nice system, but there is still some way to go for practical applications.”

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on March 5, 2014.

Elizabeth Gibney is a senior physics reporter for Nature magazine.

More by Elizabeth Gibney

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe