New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Snaking Staircase Nominated for Prestigious Engineering Award

The Miles Stair uses stronger, lighter concrete

ARCHITECT:
Eva Jiricna

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FIRM:
Techniker

HEIGHT:
62 feet


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


CANTILEVERED STEPS:
104

CONCRETE SHRINKAGE:
Up to 0.15 percent

HIGH-PERFORMANCE CONCRETE SHRINKAGE:
Less than 0.06 percent

The Miles Stair is a 12-foot-wide helix of white concrete that winds through five stories of Somerset House, a cultural center in London. Staircases typically use surrounding walls for support, but the Miles Stair relies on a core built from a latticework of lightweight stainless steel. Engineers managed to pull off this improbable structure because the steps are built from high-performance concrete, which is stronger, lighter and more stable than regular concrete.

Mixed with steel or nylon fibers, high-performance concrete is almost as strong as cast iron. It was invented to fill in gaps in large concrete works such as bridges, but within the past five years, engineers have increasingly used it to built entire structures. It also does not shrink over time like ordinary concrete does, so “what you cast is what you get,” says Matthew Wells, a project representative at Techniker, the London-based firm that built the staircase.

The Miles Stair is a nominee in the Institution of Structural Engineers’ Structural Awards, which recognizes projects for their engineering, elegance and economy. The winner will be announced on November 14, but to Wells, the staircase has already proved itself: there is an elevator at its center, but hardly anyone uses it.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 311 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Snaking Stairs” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 311 No. 5 (), p. 26
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1114-26

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe