New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Space Telescope Spots Unprecedented Asteroid with 6 Tails

Sunlight may have set the space rock spinning at breakup speed

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For the denizen of the inner asteroid belt known as P/2013 P5, breaking up isn’t hard to do. At least that’s the favored explanation for why the spinning object, which has an asteroid-like orbit but a comet-like appearance, is belching six tails of dust into space like a cosmic lawn sprinkler.

“I’ve observed lots of comets and I’ve never seen anything as weird as this one,” says planetary scientist Harold Weaver of the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Maryland.

He and his colleagues suggest that the rotation rate of P/2013 P5 has been revved up by the absorption and re-emission of sunlight shining on the spinning, asymmetric body. If the resulting forces spin it fast enough, its low gravity can no longer keep the body intact and its surface crumbles, spewing streams of dust into space. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Typical comets contain large amounts of water ice, and their tails are generated when heat from sunlight releases water vapor and other gases, which also drag dust out along with them. But the researchers say that the location of P/2013 P5 makes it a likely member of a family of asteroids that are water-poor.

Weaver and his colleagues describe the unprecedented observations, first recorded by the Hubble Space Telescope on 10 September, in an article posted on the arXiv preprint server on 7 November and due to be published in Astrophysical Journal Letters.

The six tails seem to have been created during six separate dust-ejecting events, which probably began this past spring, says Weaver. A collision with another space rock is unlikely to have generated the tails because such an impact would have spewed out all the dust in a single event, the team argues.

The proposed rotational break-up may be a key death mechanism for asteroids, Weaver suggests.

Planetary scientist William Bottke of the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado, calls the observations “cool” but adds that the break-up scenario, although plausible, “is far from proven”. The researchers would have a more convincing case if P/2013 P5 had a measured rate of rotation, he says. It is possible, Bottke adds, that the asteroid has a deposit of near-surface ice, which could have produced the dust tails when heated by sunlight.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on November 8, 2013.

Ron Cowen is a freelance science writer specializing in physics, astronomy and the history of science. He is the author of Gravity's Century: From Einstein's Eclipse to Images of Black Holes, and he is working on a book about sound preservation and how the earliest efforts to record sound changed forever how we think about time and memory.

More by Ron Cowen

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe