Star Wars Terms among 2015's Worst Passwords

In general, people tend to use passwords that are so common and easily guessable as to be nearly worthless in practice

Yuri_Arcurs ©iStock.com

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

One would think that, after years of exhortations, most people would know better than to use “password” or “12345” to protect their most sensitive data. Evidence suggests, however, that bad passwords are as popular now as they ever were, and the top 25 are trivially easy to guess.

An annual study has exposed 2015’s worst passwords, and if you’re using any of them for your accounts, now is as good a time as any to change it to something a little harder to guess.

Every January, SplashData, a Los Gatos, California-based password-management company, produces a study of the previous year’s worst passwords. The company does not share its methodology unless you sift through a (free) eBook that it sends via e-mail, but the basics are easy enough to understand. The company shares 25 passwords that are so common and easily guessable as to be nearly worthless in practice.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If you read our previous reports, you won’t be shocked that “123456” is still the most common dumb password, with “password” still occupying the No. 2 spot. The rest of the top 10 were similarly eye-rolling: “12345678,” “qwerty,” “12345,” “123456789,” “football,” “1234,” “1234567” and “baseball,” in that order. Suffice to say, don’t use a linear string of numbers to protect your most sensitive data.

Other offenders from further down the list were equally uninspired, from “welcome” at 11, to “abc123” at 13, to “letmein” at 19 (a perennial favorite since the early days of the Interwebs). Of more interest were some of the new entries, including “welcome,” “login” and “1qaz2wsx.” (The last one may seem clever until you realize that it’s just the first two rows of keys tapped vertically.)

SplashData also drew attention to three relatively new entries: “princess,” “solo” and “starwars.” These passwords, seemingly inspired by a galaxy far, far away, may or may not persist on the list, since the popularity of Star Wars tends to wax and wane with film releases. Even so, it’s probably safer to avoid simple Star Wars passwords for the moment. (Nowhere did “captainkirk1701” show up on the list, once again proving that the Star Trek franchise is superior.)

In case you’ve been silly enough to use one of the passwords on the list, SplashData does have a few commonsense recommendations: a password should be at least 12 characters long, and use a mix of numbers and upper- and lower-case letters. Don’t use the same password for multiple sites, and if you have a ton of passwords, use a password manager to keep them straight.

SplashData recommends its own password-management program, SplashID, but there are plenty of other good ones on the market.

Copyright 2016 Toms Guide, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe