New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Stars Swallow Planets and Researchers Have Proof

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: GABI PEREZ and the IAC

Some stars swallow their own planets, according to a team of Spanish and Swiss researchers. Using a highly sensitive spectrograph, they found incriminating evidence for such cannibalism in the light emitted by HD82943, a dwarf star in the constellation Hydra. Their findings are published in today's issue of Nature.

A light spectrum analysis of HD82943¿a star slightly hotter and larger than the sun, harboring its own planetary system¿revealed that it contained traces of an isotope of lithium called Lithium-6, or 6Li. Although 6Li is common in planets, it burns up quickly in stars after they are born and thus shouldn't exist in a star like HD82943. "The simplest and most convincing way to explain this observation is that one or more planets, or at least planetary material, have fallen into the star, sometime after it passed through its early evolutionary stage," Nuno Sandos of the Geneva Observatory says. The fact that the star still has 6Li left to burn suggests that it engulfed one of its planets sometime within the past 30 million years.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"We don't know of any other mechanism to explain the presence of 6Li," agrees Garik Israelian of the Astrophysics Institute of the Canary Islands. To confirm their theory, the scientists looked at another star that shared HD82943's characteristics except that it did not have planets. In keeping, they found that did not have 6Li in its spectrum. The researchers hope that this finding will help to explain how so-called exoplanets form and if this kind of cannibalism is a common process.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe