New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Supercooled Livers Last for Days

A solution that protects rat livers from freezing could extend the transplant window for human organs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When a human donor organ becomes available, transplant surgeons have only about 12 hours to collect and transplant the tissue before it breaks down. But a slow-cooling method that first chills rat livers and then drops the temperature to below freezing — allowing them to be stored in a 'supercooled' but non-frozen state — keeps them fresh for three days. If the method works for human organs, it could drastically increase the number that are available for transplantation.

Researchers have attempted to freeze organs for decades to provide more time to transport and match them to recipients. But the combination of freezing and thawing irreparably damages cells, especially if ice forms inside them. So medical engineer Korkut Uygun, of Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, and his colleagues developed a method that aims to skip the ice-forming stage of freezing altogether.

First, the team flooded rat livers with oxygen and a combination of chilled chemicals, including a glucose-like compound called 3-O-methyl-d-glucose that protects the cells against freezing. This slowly cooled the livers to 4 °C, and the researchers then stored and preserved them at –6 °C without freezing them.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Three days later, the team reversed the process by gradually bringing the stored livers back up to body temperature and transplanted them into rats. All rats that received transplants of supercooled livers survived for at least three months, whereas rats that received three-day-old livers preserved using current approaches all died. The research is published online today in Nature Medicine.

Uygun says that with a bit of tweaking — such as adjusting the rate of cooling — the method should scale up to larger organs, including human ones, and would not be limited to livers. “All organs are fair game,” he says.

Because the US Food and Drug Administration has already approved most of the technique's chemical components for use in humans, Uygun hopes to begin clinical trials within two to three years after tests in larger animals.

The preservation method could allow researchers to rescue organs that would otherwise have been discarded; according to some estimates, this could make at least 5,000 extra organs available to patients per year. And physicians would have the option of shipping organs much farther, even to other countries, to people waiting for a transplant.

“I think it’s a remarkable advance,” says cryobiologist Gregory Fahy, chief scientific officer at cryopreservation company 21st Century Medicine in Fontana, California. However, he cautions that several issues still need to be resolved — for instance, vigorous jostling of the supercooled organs during transportation could cause them to freeze by disrupting their steady temperature-suspended state, and large organs might be more difficult to cool evenly.

But the potential is vast. Fahy believes that the last major advance in organ preservation, the creation in the 1980s of a chemical solution called UW (after the University of Wisconsin, where it was developed), contributed to a big spike in the number of transplants. “I would anticipate something similar to that would happen here,” he says.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on June 29, 2014.

Sara Reardon is a freelance biomedical journalist based in Bozeman, Mont. She is a former staff reporter at Nature, New Scientist and Science and has a master’s degree in molecular biology.

More by Sara Reardon

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe