New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Supernova Erupts in Nearby Galaxy

One of the nearest stellar explosions since 1987 could become visible in two weeks to skywatchers using binoculars

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Last night, light from a new supernova reached astronomers on Earth. Its origin: the nearby galaxy M82, some 3.5 megaparsecs away (11.4 million light years). It is one of the closest and brightest supernovae seen from Earth since a monster exploded in 1987 just 168,000 light years away. Astronomers say that the latest supernova is of the type 1a class, and may help reveal how such supernovae form. Moreover, because these supernovae are used as cosmic measuring sticks, understanding them better may help clarify the shape of the Universe.

The supernova was bright enough to be discovered with a modest telescope in an unlikely spot: cloudy north London. On 21 January, around 7 pm, Steve Fossey, an astronomer at University College London, was taking students through a routine lesson with a 35-centimetre telescope at the University of London Observatory. Images of M82, also known as the Cigar Galaxy, appeared on their screens. Fossey noticed something unusual: a star sitting on the edge of the galaxy disc. It did not match Fossey's memory of the galaxy, nor images they looked up on the Internet. "It kind of looked odd," he says.

As the sky grew cloudy, Fossey's students checked their telescope for instrumental errors, and also that the object wasn't an asteroid. Fossey fired up another small telescope at the observatory and confirmed the object's location before clouds closed in at 7:45 pm. Then he emailed colleagues at California Institute of Technology in Pasadena.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


There, Yi Cao took up the baton. Cao, a graduate student in astronomy, sought a spectrum for the object – crucial for confirming the object as a supernova and discerning its type. He quickly arranged to begin observations with a 3.5 meter spectrograph-equipped telescope in New Mexico. Just before 9 am UK time, Cao dashed off a note to the Astronomer’s Telegram, a notification service. He reported that the spectrum matched that of a type Ia supernova, and that it may brighten for another two weeks.

By then, it may be visible through binoculars. In the meantime, astronomers have been emailing, calling, and tweeting about the supernova in an effort to marshal observing resources. "I came into work this morning and the phones were ringing," says Brant Robertson, an astronomer at the University of Arizona in Tucson. "It's a lot of fun."

It is also a rare and up-close look at a type Ia supernova, which seem to explode with an intrinsic brightness, suggesting a common origin. The 1987 supernova was in a different category, type 2 — explosions thought to result from the collapsing cores of giant stars. A type 1a is thought to form when stellar material piles onto a white dwarf — an old dim star that has already shed excess mass — and passes a critical threshold, igniting a thermonuclear explosion. Some astronomers say that the extra material may come not from a normal or large star, but rather from the merger of two white dwarfs (See "Kepler clue to supernova puzzle"). Regardless, astronomers agree that type 1a explosions are found most often among old white dwarfs. Robertson says that's why it is somewhat surprising to find the supernova within M82, famous among astronomers for being a young, star-forming region.

Astronomers around the world will now monitor the precise way in which the supernova brightens. They have relied on the consistency of Type 1a supernovae to make very accurate distance measurements. These cosmic yardsticks, which astronomers call 'standard candles’, were crucial in the discovery of dark energy, the mysterious force that is accelerating the expansion of the Universe.

M82's proximity means that there are many existing images of it, pre-explosion, including some from the Hubble Space Telescope. Cao and others will comb through those images, looking for what lay in the region before. It won't be easy: M82 is filled with dust. But the light the supernova shines on the dust could teach astronomers something about the host galaxy, too. One team is already looking for radioactive elements, such as nickel, that theories predict form in such supernova, says Shri Kulkarni, an astronomer at Caltech. “Dust has its own charms.”

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe