ADVERTISEMENT

The Naked Truth: Is New Passenger Scanner a Terrorist Trap or Virtual Strip Search?

New airport x-ray sees through clothes without revealing details
SmartCheck backscatter x-ray machine



COURTESY OF TSA
For the next two to three months, passengers randomly selected for additional screening at Phoenix's Sky Harbor International Airport will have the option of a typical pat down by security personnel or a one-minute, full body scan from a new type of x-ray machine that allows screeners to see through clothes. The federal government is testing so-called backscatter x-ray machines there, which can detect potentially threatening objects under a person's clothes by picking up x-rays scattered by materials. (Traditional x-ray machines pick up signals that pass through or are absorbed.)

"It's using edge detection to detect anomalies," says Joe Reiss, vice president of marketing at American Science and Engineering (AS&E), the Boston-based manufacturer of the SmartCheck machine. "If you are a suicide bomber and have a vest on, that would appear as clear as day in an image."

But critics charge the system is an invasion of privacy. "You should not have to go naked to board an aircraft," says Barry Steinhardt of the American Civil Liberties Union. If full backscatter images were used, screeners would see every detail of each individual scanned. AS&E, however, has built an algorithim into its machine that matches individuals to a general outline of the male or female form. "It looks like the chalk outline of a body rather than the x-ray image of a body," says Amy Kudwa, a spokesperson for the federal Transportation Security Administration (TSA), which is conducting the trial. "It is a nonintrusive technology; it does not require a pat down."

The downside is that by removing some of the potentially salacious detail, the developers may have diminished the device's effectiveness in detecting threats, according to Steinhardt. "The more explicit the image, the better the technology is for actually detecting weapons," he says. "The more obscured the image, the less realistic the image, the less likelihood it is going to detect contraband." In other words, he says: "You can have what amounts to a virtual strip search that may have some minor security benefit. Or you can have the illusion of security which will not detect the contraband."

The machine, however, has passed all tests set for it thus far, Reiss says. "The exact threats are classified. It has been evaluated for detecting certain threats by our engineers and TSA's and it has performed well."

Full-detail backscatter systems are already in use in the U.K., where objections focus less on nude images and more on background checks, which is a common practice in the U.S. for registered traveler programs. Michael Jenkins, a senior advisor at the RAND Corporation and a former member of the White House Commission on Aviation Safety and Security argues that security can be improved by randomly applying better detection measures. "One of the factors you have to look at is ease of circumvention," he says. "You have to look for a net security benefit."

Areas where such net security benefits could be easily gained, he says, include better screening of cargo, baggage and personal items (where backscatter is already employed to enhance regular x-ray screening at locations like the White House); securing airport perimeters; and broadening antiterrorism measures to other forms of transportation. But, he adds: "If we can keep terrorist saboteurs off commercial aviation, that is a net security benefit."

Other competing technologies include millimeter wave scanning that uses wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum between infrared and x-rays. By bouncing such waves off human beings, similar images can be created without as much detail as backscatter x-ray images and much more quickly. QinetiQ, L3 Communications and GE Security are all working on such systems, some of which are already being used at London Heathrow Airport and elsewhere to scan large crowds without the need for exclusive screening.

"The challenge is finding that balance between increased probability of finding that threat, increased efficiency for TSA and those operating airports, and privacy and ease of use of the passenger," says Joe Krisciunas, business program manager of security technologies at GE Global Research. "We are working on technologies with the goal of getting passengers through the checkpoint in 20 seconds."

Millimeter wave technology has yet to be tested in American airports, but the backscatter device will undergo further tests at Los Angeles and New York City airports. The system's speed, effectiveness and durability will be evaluated. "We process two million passengers [at U.S. airports] a day," TSA's Kudwa says. "We need a technology that doesn't break down if it is run for 16 to 20 hours straight." The trials will also determine if Americans are ready for a technology that has been available for security purposes since the 1980s but has not been used because of privacy concerns.

"About 70 percent of the passengers have opted for backscatter" during this first week, Kudwa says. "The public response has been positive and, from a logistical standpoint, things are going well."

Rights & Permissions
Share this Article:

Comments

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Scientific American Holiday Sale

Black Friday/Cyber Monday Blow-Out Sale

Enter code:
HOLIDAY 2014
at checkout

Get 20% off now! >

X

Email this Article

X