The Art of Distraction

An undersea sculpture garden in waters around Cancun is saving a reef from tourist traffic

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Managers of a national park in the sea around Cancun realized that traffic was taking its toll on the Manchones Reef. Some 87,000 divers annually swam in the clear, blue waters surrounding the reef. Scuba divers and tour boats battered and frightened the sea turtles, queen angelfish, spotted trunkfish and other reef creatures. After some trial and error, park director Jaime Gonzalez Canto landed on a solution: to redirect tourists to an alternative spectacle. He had British artist Jason deCaires Taylor create underwater sculptures that would perform double duty as an artificial reef. The Subaquatic Museum of Art opened in 2010.

The project got off to a rough start. At first, sea urchins swarmed over fuzzy films of green algae that grew on the figures, prompting tour operators to demand a cleanup. Gonzalez Canto compromised by cleaning half of the sculptures. That yielded a lesson in reef ecology. The sculptures stripped of algae-eating urchins rapidly regrew their vegetal patina (below). In contrast, the untouched sculptures soon blossomed with hard, protective layers of calcium carbonate generated by communities of organisms that slowly grew underneath the algae. The installation gradually became a microcosmic reef.

Today the installation and habitat feature more than 450 deepwater statues made of porous cement initially seeded just with fire coral. A dazzling diversity of corals, sponges and tropical fish is starting to cover the sculptures; as the statues disappear, a full reef is materializing in their place. Researchers at two Mexican universities are studying how the sculptures are transforming over time and the extent to which the museum is drawing tourists away from the troubled nearby reef.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“The challenge is to redirect the divers completely to the sculptures,” Gonzalez Canto says. “If we can find a nice alternative—something that attracts tourists, not just for a day but two or three, maybe we can one day close these resources completely.” The results will help to inform similar efforts around the globe.

Erik Vance is a science writer and relatively new father. His first book, Suggestible You (National Geographic, 2016), is about how belief affects the brain.

More by Erik Vance
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 2This article was published with the title “The Art of Distraction” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 2 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0813-16

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe