The Battle within and without for Healthier Lives

A preview by our editor in chief of the March issue of Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

I don't often get to report and write my own stories anymore. But I do deeply enjoy the privilege, as editor in chief, of seeing our crackerjack team of journalists and scientists identify large themes in the evolving flow of science as it is being applied to discovery and to solving society's pressing challenges; scientists, of course, serve both as protagonists in our feature articles and as authors.

In this issue, for instance, let us look together at our species' continuing efforts to manipulate our own body's inner mechanisms to treat diseases and generally improve public health. Take “Shock Medicine,” the cover article by brain surgeon and neuroscientist Kevin J. Tracey. He describes fascinating work in the field of bioelectronic medicine for harnessing the body's natural reflexes, rather than using drugs, to treat a variety of inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. “By precisely targeting the biological processes underlying disease, this nerve-stimulating technology should help avoid the troublesome side effects of many drugs,” Tracey writes. The diseases may include, among others, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, diabetes and perhaps even cancer.

An inner (and outer) battle of another kind is involved in the fight against Ebola, which exploded onto global headlines last year, infecting 21,000 people and killing more than 8,500 by mid-January. Journalist Helen Branswell reveals the vicious and unusual one-two punch that the small group of Ebola virus species uses to blow past the immune system. Our counterattack, accelerated by the large number of patients as global attention and funding have focused on this lethal virus, involves efforts in public health as well as the rapid development of new vaccines.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Unseen invaders also play a far milder—indeed, a beneficial—role in our microbiome, the community of microorganisms inside each of us that exceeds the number our own body's cells by 10 times. “Innovations in the Microbiome,” a special report with our sister publication Nature, takes us on a tour of how these microbes aid digestion, train the immune system and produce anti-inflammatory compounds that help to keep pathogens away. Last, as always, I find myself looking forward to seeing what basic research will turn up next time.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 312 Issue 3This article was published with the title “The Battle Within and Without for Healthier Lives” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 312 No. 3 (), p. 3
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0315-3

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe