New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The East Coast Is Extremely Vulnerable to Hurricane Flooding

Our map shows low-lying at-risk cities and coastlines everywhere, many of them sinking

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Hurricane Joaquin could be headed right for the U.S. East Coast this weekend. Models so far fail to agree on where the storm might make landfall, but shorelines from North Carolina to Massachusetts are possible targets for the high rise of ocean water, or surge, that hurricanes push ahead of them. Even if the storm veers east in the Atlantic Ocean, an unusually large atmospheric pressure gradient near the storm is destined to push strong winds onshore for many hours, bringing an extended period of high surf and heavy rain, forecasters say.

Either scenario could cause flooding because many large cities and valuable beachfronts along the coast are situated only a meter or two above sea level. The map below, developed by Scientific American, shows how far inland a surgethat is one meter high (red) or six meters high (yellow) would reach. Although a six-meter surge would be rare, one to three meters is common for Atlantic hurricanes; the biggest surges from Superstorm Sandy were four to five meters high.

Click to enlarge. Map by XNR Productions/Terra Carta. Originally produced for "Storm of the Century (Every Two Years)" by Mark Fischetti, in Scientific American, June 2013


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The map shows how sea level rise could affect the coast over many years. But a storm surge of the same height would reach just as far inland. And it would come in the course of a day.

The most practical way to protect long stretches of shoreline between cities is to pump sand from offshore deposits onto beaches every five to 10 years to replace the sediments that tides, common storms and hurricanes wear away. It is unclear, however, whether enough deposits exist with the right grain size to hold a beach or dune, for repeated reconstruction for more than a few decades. And as the map shows, much of the East Coast is also slowly subsiding, making flooding more likely over time.

Mark Fischetti was a senior editor at Scientific American for nearly 20 years and covered sustainability issues, including climate, environment, energy, and more. He assigned and edited feature articles and news by journalists and scientists and also wrote in those formats. He was founding managing editor of two spin-off magazines: Scientific American Mind and Scientific American Earth 3.0. His 2001 article “Drowning New Orleans” predicted the widespread disaster that a storm like Hurricane Katrina would impose on the city. Fischetti has written as a freelancer for the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Smithsonian and many other outlets. He co-authored the book Weaving the Web with Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, which tells the real story of how the Web was created. He also co-authored The New Killer Diseases with microbiologist Elinor Levy. Fischetti has a physics degree and has twice served as Attaway Fellow in Civic Culture at Centenary College of Louisiana, which awarded him an honorary doctorate. In 2021 he received the American Geophysical Union’s Robert C. Cowen Award for Sustained Achievement in Science Journalism. He has appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press, CNN, the History Channel, NPR News and many radio stations.

More by Mark Fischetti

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe