New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The First Indirect Detection of Dark Matter

Mysterious light at the center of the milky way could be our first look at dark particles

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Dark matter is one of the universe's most befuddling, and elusive, components. It could make up roughly a quarter of the universe's total mass and energy, yet no one knows for sure because no one has actually seen it. Well, it may be showing itself at last. nasa's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope has recorded high-energy gamma-ray light emanating from the center of the Milky Way that fits well with dark matter predictions. “I would consider it currently the most exciting signal that we have,” said physicist Rafael Lang of Purdue University, who was not involved in the study, at the American Physical Society's meeting in April in Savannah, Ga. If the light were truly caused by dark matter, it would be the first indirect detection of the particles that make up this shadowy substance.

Dark matter is most likely made of so-called weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), particles that would be their own antimatter partners and therefore destroy one another on colliding. Such WIMP annihilations would produce normal matter particles that would in turn create gamma-ray photons. Because dark matter should be densest at the Milky Way's core, that is the best place to look for that light.

Scientists had previous hints that the Fermi telescope is seeing more light at the galactic center than expected. [For news of another unexplained Fermi signal, see page 42.] But where earlier analyses were inconclusive, the new study found a stark signal: an excess of gamma-ray photons extending at least 5,000 light-years from the Milky Way's center (above). “It looks exactly like we've always expected dark matter to look,” says Dan Hooper of Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Ill., an author of the study.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Of course, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Most scientists are reserving judgment until the signal is seen by other instruments or in other places. But dark matter may have gotten a little less elusive.

Clara Moskowitz is chief of reporters at Scientific American, where she covers astronomy, space, physics and mathematics. She has been at Scientific American for more than a decade; previously she worked at Space.com. Moskowitz has reported live from rocket launches, space shuttle liftoffs and landings, suborbital spaceflight training, mountaintop observatories, and more. She has a bachelor’s degree in astronomy and physics from Wesleyan University and a graduate degree in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.

More by Clara Moskowitz
Scientific American Magazine Vol 311 Issue 1This article was published with the title “A Glimpse at the Unseen” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 311 No. 1 (), p. 25
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0714-25

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe