New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The Great Tit Chooses Love over Food

Pairs of the birds stay together no matter what—even if it means one loses out on a meal

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Like most birds, the great tit is (mostly) monogamous. Every winter pairs of the stunning yellow-breasted songbirds (above) reunite for the upcoming breeding season and spend the bulk of their time together—staking out territory, building nests and even foraging. The strength of their bond is palpable, but what would happen if the birds were forced to choose between love and food?

To find out, University of Oxford zoologist Josh A. Firth and his colleagues arranged a set of feeders in a forest near the English countryside. Some of those feeders were set to open only for birds that had been tagged with odd-numbered microchips; others allowed access only to those tagged with even numbers. Thus, pairs with matching assignments could open the same feeders and feast on sunflower seeds together. Mismatched couples, on the other hand, were forced to dine at different venues.

Over the course of three months the researchers monitored 17 couples, including seven odd-plus-even pairs that could not eat at the same feeders. They found that birds from those mismatched pairs visited inaccessible feeders nearly four times as often as those from matched pairs, suggesting that mates were sticking together even if it meant one of them lost out on a meal. The results were published in December in Current Biology.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Great tit couples may remain side by side even when one of them is hungry because they will need each other later on. “The pair bond is vital for great tits,” Firth says. “Single parents cannot cope with the demands of raising a brood alone. Their only hope for success depends on having a supportive and reliable partner.”

Andrew King, a behavioral ecologist at Swansea University in Wales, says that these findings mirror observations in a wide variety of animals, ranging from primates to fish. “Getting less food and foraging with a ‘friend’ may still be better than getting more food and foraging [alone],” he says. In fact, many of the thwarted birds in the experiment eventually learned to scrounge quickly from their partner's food, taking advantage of a two-second window before the feeders locked back up.

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman
Scientific American Magazine Vol 314 Issue 2This article was published with the title “When Love Wins” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 314 No. 2 (), p. 23
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0216-23

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe