The Nastiest of the Cold Viruses Reveals Its True Form

A new model of a particularly loathsome virus may enable new treatments for the common cold.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

It was only in 2006 that researchers discovered the latest of three major viruses known to cause the common cold. Now, a new 3-D model of this pathogen, the nastiest of the rhinoviruses, may help pave the way to more effective cold remedies.

Ann Palmenberg, a biochemist at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, and her colleagues constructed the model of rhinovirus C to better understand how all rhinoviruses (species in the genus Enterovirus) work, grow and react. “It explains a lot of the missing biology, if you will,” she says. The findings were published in the January 5 issue of Virology.

The model reveals that the capsid, or protein shell, of rhinovirus C differs from those of rhinoviruses A and B, for which 3-D models are already known. A capsid, or protein shell, encases a virus and allows it to attach to a host cell. Understanding the structure of a capsid allows researchers to create antivirals that can latch onto the pathogen’s protein shell.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


That finding also explains why treatments for rhinoviruses A and B that succeeded in the lab later failed in clinical trials. In addition to other complications it is thought that patients in clinical trials carried a rhinovirus C strain along with A and B, so drugs designed to tackle only the latter types had no impact on what is now understood to be a very different rhinovirus C species.

Palmenberg was part of a team that sequenced rhinovirus C’s genome in 2009, creating a blueprint for what would become the model. “It turns out that the Cs, unlike the As and Bs, have deletions in a very crucial capsid protein,” Palmenberg says. “We got lucky in the way nature designed its sequence.”

Rhinovirus C is thought to cause half of all childhood colds. Estimates show that all rhinoviruses are responsible for millions of illnesses each year, totally about $40 billion in lost productivity in the U.S. alone. “It turns out that the Cs are really nasty,” Palmenberg says. “They're the ones that make kids the sickest and they're the ones that trigger asthma expiration.”

Knowledge of the structure of the capsid should help scientists get closer to designing specific drugs to combat rhinovirus C. “One of the things structures would be used for would be to rationally design inhibitors that might act as antivirals,” says John Treanor, chief of the Infectious Diseases Division at the University of Rochester Medical Center. Inhibitors prevent viruses from attaching to host cells.

Palmenberg says that all strains of rhinovirus C appear similar, as is the case with A and B strains as well. “So if something that works against a C—it will take out all of the Cs,” she says. “So that's the good news. The bad news is that the existing drugs won't do it.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe