New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The Nastiest of the Cold Viruses Reveals Its True Form

A new model of a particularly loathsome virus may enable new treatments for the common cold.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

It was only in 2006 that researchers discovered the latest of three major viruses known to cause the common cold. Now, a new 3-D model of this pathogen, the nastiest of the rhinoviruses, may help pave the way to more effective cold remedies.

Ann Palmenberg, a biochemist at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, and her colleagues constructed the model of rhinovirus C to better understand how all rhinoviruses (species in the genus Enterovirus) work, grow and react. “It explains a lot of the missing biology, if you will,” she says. The findings were published in the January 5 issue of Virology.

The model reveals that the capsid, or protein shell, of rhinovirus C differs from those of rhinoviruses A and B, for which 3-D models are already known. A capsid, or protein shell, encases a virus and allows it to attach to a host cell. Understanding the structure of a capsid allows researchers to create antivirals that can latch onto the pathogen’s protein shell.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


That finding also explains why treatments for rhinoviruses A and B that succeeded in the lab later failed in clinical trials. In addition to other complications it is thought that patients in clinical trials carried a rhinovirus C strain along with A and B, so drugs designed to tackle only the latter types had no impact on what is now understood to be a very different rhinovirus C species.

Palmenberg was part of a team that sequenced rhinovirus C’s genome in 2009, creating a blueprint for what would become the model. “It turns out that the Cs, unlike the As and Bs, have deletions in a very crucial capsid protein,” Palmenberg says. “We got lucky in the way nature designed its sequence.”

Rhinovirus C is thought to cause half of all childhood colds. Estimates show that all rhinoviruses are responsible for millions of illnesses each year, totally about $40 billion in lost productivity in the U.S. alone. “It turns out that the Cs are really nasty,” Palmenberg says. “They're the ones that make kids the sickest and they're the ones that trigger asthma expiration.”

Knowledge of the structure of the capsid should help scientists get closer to designing specific drugs to combat rhinovirus C. “One of the things structures would be used for would be to rationally design inhibitors that might act as antivirals,” says John Treanor, chief of the Infectious Diseases Division at the University of Rochester Medical Center. Inhibitors prevent viruses from attaching to host cells.

Palmenberg says that all strains of rhinovirus C appear similar, as is the case with A and B strains as well. “So if something that works against a C—it will take out all of the Cs,” she says. “So that's the good news. The bad news is that the existing drugs won't do it.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe