Astrophysicists Turn to the Skies to Measure the Mass of the Neutrino

How an almost massless particle has shaped the large-scale structure of the universe

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Measuring the minuscule mass of neutrinos has so far proved impossible—and not for lack of trying. Numerous laboratory experiments over the past few decades have succeeded only in placing loose limits on the three neutrino masses.

We have very compelling reasons to expect that the best way to measure the mass of these tiny particles is, surprisingly, to look for their influence at the largest scales of the universe. For although neutrinos are virtually massless and nearly invisible, their sheer numbers—some 1089 in the universe—make them very consequential players in the cosmos.

Our logic goes like this: Early in the history of the universe, when everything was very hot and dense, nuclear reactions forged helium from hydrogen, releasing huge numbers of neutrinos as a by-product. As the universe evolved, expanded and cooled, small fluctuations in the density of this primordial particle soup were amplified; in regions of above-average density, gravity tried to pull more material in.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Dark matter, the essentially invisible stuff that accounts for a goodly portion of the universe's mass, collapsed into clumps first because it only interacts through gravity. These initial clumps of dark matter formed the seeds of the galaxies and the clusters of galaxies that we see today. Neutrinos, being extremely light, began to clump somewhat later on in the universe's development. In fact, by zipping so freely through the cosmos, neutrinos have actually slowed the clumping of dark matter—an effect that should be detectable today.

The more massive the neutrinos, the more they will have hindered the clumping of matter—in effect, blurring the edges in the large-scale structure of the universe. By measuring how matter is distributed in the universe, then, we can infer how massive neutrinos are.

Mapping the distribution of matter—most of which is dark matter—is hardly straightforward. Yet researchers have seen that the leftover radiation from the big bang, known as the cosmic microwave background (CMB), is slightly distorted because of the light-bending gravitational effects of dark matter clumps that fill the space between the CMB and us. Examining this “gravitational lensing” of the CMB is a very promising way of measuring the distribution of dark matter in the universe.

New precision measurements of the CMB now under way will enable us to measure the lensing distortions to very high accuracy, effectively mapping out the otherwise invisible dark matter. If the distribution of dark matter is confined to sharp-edged structures separated by voids, we can infer that the neutrino masses are small; if instead the edges are blurred, we will know that the neutrino masses are larger. The new generation of CMB experiments should allow us to pin down the combined masses of the three neutrino types to within one five-millionth of the mass of the electron.

That it may be possible to measure the mass of the lightest and most elusive of subatomic particles by observing the entire universe is just another example of how the study of physics, across all scales, continues to surprise and inspire astrophysicists to delve ever deeper into the workings of the natural world.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe