The Teen Brain: Perils and Promise

A preview by our editor in chief of the June issue of Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Listening to my 14-year-old daughter explain her writing assignment the other night, I was surprised to learn we both had similar homework. I was about to start this letter to introduce the current issue and its cover story, “The Amazing Teen Brain,” by psychiatrist Jay N. Giedd. Her essay was going to analyze the reasons behind the rash behavior of the famous star-crossed young lovers in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet. As she explained, “Teenagers' brains are not fully developed yet, so they have a problem with impulse control.” As she dispassionately talked about the brains of people her own age, I was struck anew by how grown-up teens can seem.

At the same time, as we are reminded painfully and too frequently not only by fictional plays but also by real-world headlines, adolescents are uniquely vulnerable to risky behavior, leading to mishaps or to recruitment to violent ends as soldiers or even terrorists. A key question around the recent trial of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who was 19 at the time of the Boston Marathon bombing, for instance, was the degree to which he was under the influence of his 26-year-old brother, Tamerlan.

At root is a developmental mismatch between the mental networks that manage emotion, which shift rapidly at puberty, and those that handle so-called executive function, which mature in a person's 20s. Giedd also describes how an earlier onset of puberty in recent decades has extended this angst-ridden period.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The protracted maturation, however, beneficially creates prolonged plasticity—enabling teenagers' enviable leaps of cognition and adaptability, for example, to today's data-enriched world. Both traits have served our species well in the past. Now, as science provides a better understanding of this powerfully influential developmental window, society—from parents to policy leaders to youngsters themselves—can work together to support teens on their journey.

Rather than soaring into the future, the Space Launch System, a successor to the shuttle, has been called a “rocket to nowhere”—a congressional jobs program with little hope of actually flying to space. But in “Birth of a Rocket,” journalist David H. Freedman takes a look at how the system, which is on time and on budget for a 2018 flight, could actually become the vehicle of choice to reach Mars in about 25 years. Given the sufficient political will—no small hurdle—the teens of today could see humans step onto another planet.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 312 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Promises and Perils” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 312 No. 6 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0615-4

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe