Tropics Feel the Heat of Climate Change

Tropical ecosystems appear to be more sensitive to climate change and less able to store carbon – two developments surprising scientists

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

LONDON – Tropical ecosystems may be responding to global warming more energetically than anyone had expected.

Scientists from China, Germany, France, the United Kingdom and the United States report in the journal Nature that the tropical carbon cycle – the uptake and release of carbon dioxide from and back into the atmosphere – has become twice as sensitive to temperature change in the last 50 years.

A one degree rise in average tropical temperature leads to a release of around two billion more tons of carbon per year from tropical forests and savannahs, compared with the 1960s and 1970s.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This is unexpected. Climate scientists had foreseen the ability of land-based ecosystems to store carbon declining through the coming century as average global temperatures rise, but not on this scale.

Positive feedback loop
To arrive at their conclusions, the researchers looked not at the crude rise in carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere, but the year-to-year variations of traces of the gas recorded both at the top of the Mauna Loa volcano in Hawaii and at the South Pole, and then matched these with mean annual temperature variations over the same timescale.

Together, the findings seem to show that tropical ecosystems are becoming more sensitive to climate change. This could be another example of what engineers call positive feedback – warmer summers make forests drier and release more carbon dioxide to make summers warmer, and so on.

There is evidence that the tropical regions have experienced more drought over the last five decades. More to the point, the team’s conclusion really suggests that if existing climate models provide uncertain projections of the future, it is because the information available is still incomplete.

It does however also indicate that variations in carbon dioxide levels would provide a monitor of the way tropical forests and grasslands are responding to climate.

"This enhancement is very unlikely to have resulted from chance, and may provide a new perspective on a possible shift in the terrestrial carbon cycle over the past five decades," said Xuhui Wang of Peking University in Beijing, who led the study.

Added Pierre Friedlingstein, of the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom and a member of the research team: "Current land carbon cycle systems do not show this increase over the last 50 years, because these models underestimate emerging drought effects on tropical ecosystems."

This article originally appeared at The Daily Climate, the climate change news source published by Environmental Health Sciences, a nonprofit media company.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe