New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Twitter Trends Help Researchers Forecast Viral Memes

Researchers are forecasting which memes will spread far and wide

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

What makes a meme— an idea, a phrase, an image—go viral? For starters, the meme must have broad appeal, so it can spread not just within communities of like-minded individuals but can leap from one community to the next. Researchers, by mining public Twitter data, have found that a meme's “virality” is often evident from the start. After only a few dozen tweets, a typical viral meme (as defined by tweets using a given hashtag) will already have caught on in numerous communities of Twitter users. In contrast, a meme destined to peter out will resonate in fewer groups.

“We didn't expect to see that the viral memes were going to behave very differently from nonviral memes at their beginnings,” says Lilian Weng, a graduate student in informatics at Indiana University Bloomington. Those differences allowed Weng and her colleagues to forecast memes that would go viral with an accuracy of better than 60 percent, the team reported in a 2013 study.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Graphic by Jan Willem Tulp, for Scientific American
SOURCE:“VIRALITY PREDICTION AND COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN SOCIAL NETWORKS,” BY LILIAN WENG, FILIPPO MENCZER AND YONG-YEOL AHN, IN SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, Vol. 3, Article No. 2522; AUGUST 28, 2013

More in this Article: See how “Gangnam Style” went viral.

John Matson is a former reporter and editor for Scientific American who has written extensively about astronomy and physics.

More by John Matson
Scientific American Magazine Vol 310 Issue 1This article was published with the title “What It Means to Go Viral” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 310 No. 1 (), p. 84
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0114-84

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe