Why do two great tastes sometimes not taste great together?

Biosciences professor Tim Jacob, who studies smell and taste at Cardiff University in Wales, mixes up an answer

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Why do two things I like to eat sometimes taste so bad when eaten together? —R. Lange, Houston

Biosciences professor Tim Jacob, who studies smell and taste at Cardiff University in Wales, mixes up an answer:

Among the five tastes, salty, sweet and umami (meaty or savory) are appetitive, driving us toward essential nutrients, whereas bitter and sour are aversive, alerting us to potentially harmful substances. Mixing the aversive with the appetitive sends conflicting information to the brain, and confusion is what the senses are trying to avoid as they supply you with useful, lifesaving information. This mixed signal is why you reject food that has gone off. You do not want to eat a blend of the good and the bad.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Yet consider the phrase “sugaring the pill”: pills are medicine and as such are poisonous in large quantities. They thus taste bitter but can be made more palatable by a camouflaging sugar coating. Similarly, coffee can be improved for people who are sensitive to bitterness by masking its sharpness with cream or sugar.

As adults, we can override these warnings and acquire tastes for coffee, olives or strong cheese. But you will confound your senses if you mix a formerly aversive taste with an appetitive one. (Care for some pickles and cocoa?) There can be delight in the confusion, however: sweet and sour is a popular choice in Chinese cuisine.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe