U.S. Plan for 2050

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


By 2050 vast photovoltaic arrays in the Southwest would supply electricity instead of fossil-fueled power plants and would also power a widespread conversion to plug-in electric vehicles. Excess energy would be stored as compressed air in underground caverns. Large arrays that concentrate sunlight to heat water would also supply electricity. A new high-voltage, direct-current transmission backbone would carry power to regional markets nationwide. The technologies and factors critical to their success are summarized at the right, along with the extent to which the technologies must be deployed by 2050. The plan would substantially cut the country’s consumption of fossil fuels and its emission of greenhouse gases (below). We have assumed a 1 percent annual growth in net energy demand. And we have anti­cipated improvements in solar technologies forecasted only until 2020, with no further gains beyond that date.  
—K.Z., J.M. and V.F.

 

Technology

Critical Factor

2007

2050

Advances needed

Photovoltaics

Land area

10 sq miles

30,000 sq miles

Policies to develop large public land areas

Thin-film module efficiency

10%

14%

More transparent materials to improve light transmission; more densely doped layers to increase voltage; larger modules to reduce inactive area

Installed cost

$4/W

$1.20/W

Improvements in module efficiency; gains from volume production

Electricity price

16¢/kWh

5¢/kWh

Follows from lower installed cost

Total capacity

0.5 GW

2,940 GW

National energy plan built around solar power

Compressed-air energy storage (with photovoltaic electricity)

Volume

0

535 billion cu ft

Coordination of site development with natural gas industry

Installed cost

$5.80/W

$3.90/W

Economies of scale; decreasing photovoltaic electricity prices

Electricity price

20¢/kWh

9¢/kWh

Follows from lower installed cost

Total capacity

0.1 GW

558 GW

National energy plan

Concentrated solar power

Land area

10 sq miles

16,000 sq miles

Policies to develop large public land areas

Solar-to-electric efficiency

13%

17%

Fluids that transfer heat more effectively

Installed cost

$5.30/W

$3.70/W

Single-tank thermal storage systems; economies of scale

Electricity price

18¢/kWh

9¢/kWh

Follows from lower installed cost

Total capacity

0.5 GW

558 GW

National energy plan

DC transmission

Length

500 miles

100,000- 500,000 miles

New high-voltage DC grid from Southwest to rest of country

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe