Virtual Reality Treatment Relieves Amputee's Phantom Pain

A virtual arm superimposed over a live video feed of the patient was controlled using electrodes attached to his stump

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Amputees who suffer from phantom-limb pain could get some relief, thanks to a potential new experimental treatment involving virtual reality.

One man who suffered severe phantom pain for 48 years after his arm was amputated reported a dramatic reduction in his pain after the experimental treatment, in which signals from his limb stump controlled a virtual reality arm, according to a case study detailed today (Feb. 25) in the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience.

The therapy is promising, but will need to be tested in controlled clinical trials with more patients to prove its efficacy, scientists say.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


After people lose an arm or a leg, they often experience painful sensations of their missing limb, known as phantom pain. As much as 70 percent of amputees experience phantom pain, which can be chronic and debilitating. The pain's causes are unknown, but may result from remaining brain representation of the missing limb.

"Phantom-limb pain is very common in amputees," said study researcher Max Ortiz Catalan, a doctoral student in biomedical engineering at Chalmers University of Technology, in Sweden. "Unfortunately, today there is no single treatment that works for everybody."[See Video of Amputee Using Virtual Reality System]

Current treatments for phantom pain include drugs, acupuncture, hypnosis and "mirror therapy," which involves an amputee placing their intact limb inside a box with two mirrors positioned so the normal limb appears where the amputated limb should be. The reflection in the mirrors tricks the brain into thinking the reflected limb is the missing one. Mirror therapy has shown some effectiveness in small studies, but remains controversial.

Controlling a virtual arm

In the new study, Ortiz Catalan and his colleagues developed a therapy that involves augmented reality, and tested it on the man, whose phantom pain hadn't responded to other treatments.

Electrodes recorded muscle signals from the stump of the patient's arm, and used software to convert those signals into movement of a virtual arm, superimposed over a video of the patient taken with a webcam. By thinking about moving his missing arm, the patient was able to control the virtual arm, using it to perform tasks such as driving a simulated car in a racing game.

The patient reported that his pain gradually reduced, and he experienced pain-free periods over the course of his virtual reality treatments. He said his hand changed from feeling painfully clenched to feeling open and relaxed.

In contrast to mirror therapy or virtual reality systems that are controlled by the intact limb, the new system uses signals from the damaged limb itself, so it could also be used by bilateral amputees, the researchers said.

One of biggest problems with traditional rehabilitation is that patients don't complete their therapy, Ortiz Catalan told Live Science. The new virtual reality therapy would be more fun and engaging, he said.

Clinical studies needed

The use of residual muscle activity to control a virtual arm isn't completely new, said Tamar Makin, a neuroscientist at Oxford University, in England, who studies phantom pain but was not involved in the study. Researchers have also used muscle signals from a limb stump to control prosthetic limbs.

Makin praised the work, but said it was difficult to draw conclusions about the treatment's effectiveness until a controlled study with more patients can be done.

The Chalmers University researchers plan to run such a study, in collaboration with Sahlgrenska University Hospital, the University of Gothenburg and the medical technology company Integrum.

Meanwhile, the researchers have developed a version of the system that can be used at home, once it is approved. Patients who have restricted mobility because of a stroke or spinal cord injury might also benefit from the therapy, the researchers said.

Copyright 2014 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Tanya Lewis is senior desk editor for health and medicine at Scientific American. She writes and edits stories for the website and print magazine on topics ranging from COVID to organ transplants. She also appears on Scientific American’s podcast Science Quickly and writes Scientific American’s weekly Health & Medicine newsletter. She has held a number of positions over her nine years at Scientific American, including health editor, assistant news editor and associate editor at Scientific American Mind. Previously, she has written for outlets that include Insider, Wired, Science News and others. She has a degree in biomedical engineering from Brown University and one in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz. Follow her on Bluesky @tanyalewis.bsky.social

More by Tanya Lewis

LiveScience is one of the biggest and most trusted popular science websites operating today, reporting on the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world.

More by LiveScience

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe