Wandering Fly Gene Supports New Model of Speciation

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The jumping of a gene from one chromosome to another can likely contribute to the birth of new species, a genetic analysis of flies reveals. The result validates an underappreciated mechanism of so-called reproductive isolation, a key component of speciation.

The formation of a species means that a group of organisms splits into two populations that cannot reproduce with one another. The reigning model of reproductive isolation holds that genetic differences accumulate between populations that render their hybrid offspring dead or sterile, like the mule, an infertile child of the donkey and horse. Many researchers have long assumed that this isolation must be the result of changes in gene sequence that introduce an incompatibility between groups, such as new sperm that do not recognize the old eggs. But examples of such speciation genes are very few.

Hoping to uncover a fresh example, researchers hybridized two species of fly, Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans, which would normally produce sterile males but were modified to yield modestly fertile females capable of breeding with a regular male melanogaster. Prior studies had shown that a melanogaster becomes sterile from immobile sperm if it incorporates a small part of the simulans genome--specifically, if it has a pair of fourth chromosomes from simulans instead of its own pair. By breeding hybrid flies for several generations, the group re-created such minimal hybrids. To discover which gene on the fourth chromosome of the simulans is responsible for neutralizing sperm, the group mated them to melanogaster flies missing different genes from their fourth chromosomes. Most deletions would spare the essential gene and lead to fertile offspring; only a fly lacking that gene would sire sterile children again. The group found the crucial gene, JYAlpha, but to their great surprise, the corresponding simulans gene is not on the fly's fourth chromosome but on its third. "It was completely unexpected," says John Masly of the University of Rochester, lead author of the report published in the September 8 Science.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Because each species carries the gene on a different chromosome, hybrids can end up without any copy of the essential gene. The result shows that reproductive isolation can begin to evolve without a change in the function of a gene, says Masly. Some take satisfaction in the finding. "For me it was a great result," says Michael Lynch of Indiana University, who recently revived the mechanism. "The fly people have been extremely skeptical of this model. It's probably going to dramatically change people's views of speciation."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe