Weird Layer-Cake Warps Found in Greenland's Ice

Refrozen meltwater causes sinuous layers of ice to build up beneath the flat expanse of the Greenland Ice Sheet

The flat, glistening, white expanse of the Greenland Ice Sheet, stretching out across hundreds of thousands of square miles, appears placid, unchanging … boring even. But this tranquil surface belies the turmoil taking place below, at the base of the ice sheet. There, scientists have discovered sections of ice up to a kilometer thick and tens of kilometers long where meltwater has refrozen to the base of the ice sheet, setting off a dynamic process that causes the layers of ice to build up over the eons and contort into sinuous folds.

The refreezing and folding heats the surrounding ice, which impacts how it flows on its journey from the ice sheet’s interior out to the ocean. Several of those regions coincide with the place where one glacier dramatically speeds up. Understanding what controls the behavior and flow of ice sheets and the glaciers within them is a key part of improving climate models that project what effects global warming might have on the ice and how that might impact sea level rise.

“What this shows is we have to go past just watching the surface,” said Robin Bell, a climate researcher with Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory and leader of a new study describing the strange sections of ice in the journal Nature Geoscience.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Peering Inside an Ice Sheet
Sections of refrozen ice were known to exist at the base of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet, which is much thicker, larger and colder than the Greenland Ice Sheet, itself almost incomprehensibly large. Early radar measurements made by flights over Greenland hinted that something similar could be hiding under the surface there, but the data was too coarse and sparse to tell for sure. Some thought the radar signatures were the echoes of mountains trapped below the ice. But her experience in Antarctica had Bell “pretty convinced” that they were showing these “basal units” of refrozen meltwater.

She was able to confirm her suspicions when NASA’s Operation IceBridge — a series of scientific flights taken across Earth’s polar region, taking radar scans, measuring gravity and gathering other valuable data — were able to peer beneath the ice surface in greater detail and in side-by-side transects. Bell compared the difference between the early radar and the data from IceBridge to writing with a crayon and then with “a beautiful fine marker.”

The radar data showed that while the surface of the ice sheet may appear “boring” during the hours and hours spent in a research plane, “when you can actually look inside the ice sheet, it’s like, ‘Wow’,” she told Climate Central.

“They did a commendable job of locating these features,” said glaciologist Joe MacGregor, of the University of Texas, who was not involved in the research.

‘Tortured Ice’
The basal units start with meltwater — a key influence on the flow of glaciers and ice sheets. Meltwater comes from two sources: It forms when the sun’s rays shine on the surface of the ice sheet in the summer, creating pools that can then go cascading down huge conduits in the ice sheet called moulins, eventually winding its way to the ice sheet’s base. It can also form at the base of the ice sheet as heat generated in Earth’s interior warms the ice or as friction from the movement of the ice against the bedrocks causes it to melt.

 

Once there, two processes can also cause the meltwater to refreeze to the bottom of the ice sheet: “One is it just kind of cools slowly,” Bell said. As if you took it and “just threw it in the freezer.”

The other is a little more complicated. The movement of the meltwater is under the control of the glacier, which can cause the water to flow upslope on the underlying bedrock. This causes the water to become supercooled and it freezes instantly.

When the meltwater refreezes, Bell and her colleagues think that something that sounds a bit paradoxical happens: The freezing water gives off heat, which softens the surrounding ice and causes the layers of ice to warp to create what Bell calls “tortured ice.”

The ice sheet is often described as a layer cake, made up of layers of ice that build over the eons as new snow is deposited at the top of the ice sheet, pushing down on older layers sitting underneath. The basal units throw this tidy arrangement into disarray, bending the layers and forcing older layers atop newer ones. These contortions can reach halfway up the thickness of the ice sheet.

“It’s a pretty ugly cake if that’s what it is,” MacGregor said.

Next Steps
Bell and her team think the softening and warping of the ice sheet in these areas affects the ice sheet’s flow there. The data Bell and her team examined shows that several of these units line up with the point where Greenland’s Petermann Glacier speeds its flow.

“It does actually seem to affect how one of these glaciers is flowing,” MacGregor said.

That match was a surprise to the team, but shows them that there are unanticipated processes controlling the flow of the ice, Bell and MacGregor both said, and the bottom of the ice sheet is more varied than previously thought.

It’s too early to tell how this refreezing and its effects might factor into calculations of sea level rise, MacGregor said, but it does give scientists more insight into the workings of the whole ice sheet system.

Now, scientists need to model the processes at play to figure out exactly how it works and see if they can predict “where and when this process happens,” Bell said. Whether the freezing is controlled by the meltwater, or the thickness of the ice overhead or perhaps by the cycling of the ice ages isn’t known. “I officially say, ‘We don’t quite know yet’,” Bell said.

This article is reproduced with permission from Climate Central. The article was first published on June 15, 2014.

Andrea Thompson is senior desk editor for life science at Scientific American, covering the environment, energy and earth sciences. She has been covering these issues for nearly two decades. Prior to joining Scientific American, she was a senior writer covering climate science at Climate Central and a reporter and editor at Live Science, where she primarily covered earth science and the environment. She has moderated panels, including as part of the United Nations Sustainable Development Media Zone, and appeared in radio and television interviews on major networks. She holds a graduate degree in science, health and environmental reporting from New York University, as well as a B.S. and an M.S. in atmospheric chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Follow Thompson on Bluesky @andreatweather.bsky.social

More by Andrea Thompson

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe