New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

What substances, such as cerium sulfate, have a lower solubility when they are heated?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Ted Lindeman, professor and chair of the chemistry department of Colorado College in Colorado Springs, provides this reply:

A casual look through the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics will turn up dozens of substances that share with cerium(III) sulfate a preference for dissolving in cooler water. A few examples are:

ammonium bromoplatinate
hydroxide
sulfate octahydrate
hydroxystannate
sodium selenate
sodium dihydrogen pyrophosphate hexahydrate
sulfate octahydrate
ytterbium sulfate
. . . and virtually any substance that's a gas at ordinary temperatures, including nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen, helium, carbon dioxide, and ammonia.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This solubility behavior accounts for most of the noise your teapot makes before the water reaches its boiling point. Air that was dissolved in the cold water can't stay there as the temperature rises, and it bubbles loudly out of solution. By the time the water itself is hot enough to vaporize rapidly, most of the dissolved gases have left.

Table salt (sodium chloride) is almost indifferent to temperature in this regard: It's only 10 percent more soluble in boiling water than in ice water.

The thermodynamic "rule of thumb" is that if heat is given off when a substance dissolves, then that stuff will dissolve better in cold water than in warm. (This is a consequence of Le Chatelier's principle, discovered by the inventor of oxyacetylene welding.)

This solubility rule applies only to solids that are stable in the presence of water. Consider, for example, those instant "hot packs" that athletic trainers use, which produce heat by combining calcium chloride with water. Calcium chloride is unstable in the presence of water. The crystalline contents of the hot packs work because they are anhydrous (water free), having been roasted in a furnace. When mixed with water, most of the crystals do dissolve, releasing heat. Those that don't dissolve incorporate water molecules into their solid lattice, four to each calcium atom. The resulting crystals of calcium chloride tetrahydrate are stable in contact with water, but it turns out that they absorb heat upon dissolving, so the rule of thumb applies in reverse: solid CaCl2o¿4H2O dissolves better in hot water than in cold. And, of course, it would be useless in a hot pack.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe