New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

When Will Obama Be Forgotten? Study Reveals Cultural Memory Patterns

A 35-year-long study traces recollection of past presidents and finds predictable trends

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As President Barack Obama approaches the end of his second term, he must find himself wondering (along with countless pundits) about his legacy. The results of a recent study suggest that the question of how long he will be remembered can be addressed scientifically. The rate at which the majority of the population forgets about presidents—and other cultural icons and events—follows a predictable pattern, according to Henry Roediger, principal investigator of the Memory Lab at Washington University in St. Louis.

Roediger and fellow Washington psychologist Andrew DeSoto studied the results of a presidential recall test issued to a total of 415 undergraduate students in 1974, 1991 and 2009, as well as a similar online test given to 497 adults, aged 18 to 69, in 2014. Participants attempted to recall as many U.S. presidents as possible and place them in the correct order.

Roediger found that people's patterns of forgetting were remarkably similar, regardless of their age or when they took the test. In general, people tend to remember the first few presidents, along with the most recent eight or nine presidents, and one or two presidents in the middle, such as Abraham Lincoln, who governed during distinctive events.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Even more surprising, Roediger says, is the fact that our memories tend to follow the same pattern for all information, not just presidents. One can draw a “forgetting curve” that applies equally to historical events, television shows and even personal memories.

“There's no reason that forgetting presidents should follow the same curve as forgetting a list of words,” Roediger says, “but that's what we see in the data.” As for Obama, the fact that he is the first African-American president means he will probably be remembered long past the 100 years or so that it will take for Bush and Clinton to become as obscure as Fillmore and Harrison seem today.

How Does Your Memory for Presidents Stack Up?

The test is simple: Write down as many presidents as you can name, in the order you believe to be correct. Then visit ScientificAmerican.com/Mind/presidents to see how your memorycompares with that of other people today and in the past.

SA Mind Vol 26 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Once Famous, Now Forgotten” in SA Mind Vol. 26 No. 3 (), p. 17
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0515-17

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe