New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Which Direction Home?

Mom and dad can give some migrating birds mixed signals about how to get home

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Every autumn migrating birds in the Northern Hemisphere fly south to escape the cold. If we humans were to make such a journey, we would need a map. But each bird has its route stored at least partially in its genes. Rather than relying solely on external cues, it has an innate flight plan.

Most individuals within a single population follow the same migration path, taking advantage of favorable winds and optimal topography. But some birds are hybrids; their parents come from different populations and so have different paths. How do the birds choose?

Early experiments suggested that hybrids take an intermediate route relative to the ones their parents follow. The tests used laboratory-raised birds whose preferences were assessed using a cage designed to record the direction the birds wanted to fly. “These studies were fantastic, but what we really needed to do was follow [wild] birds over an entire year,” says Kira Delmore, a graduate student at the University of British Columbia.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Delmore and her colleagues outfitted 97 wild Swainson’s thrushes with tiny GPS trackers. Some of the subjects belonged to a coastal subspecies that flies along the west coast of North America to winter in Mexico, Guatemala and Honduras. Others belonged to an inland subspecies that flies through east-central North America to Colombia and Venezuela. The hybrids of the group were born in a small area where the two populations overlap in the coastal mountains of western Canada.

The team recovered useful data from 21 of the birds and found that some hybrids flew intermediate routes compared with their parents, confirming the earlier lab findings. Others took mixed routes, following one parent’s path in spring and then switching to the other’s in fall. Still others stuck with the route of one parent. Intriguingly, some of those hybrids that took intermediate routes also settled in intermediate destinations. “This is the first paper to show that both [the] route and destination of hybrids can be inter- mediate,” says Bridget J. Stutchbury, a bird researcher at York University in Toronto. The study was published in October in Ecology Letters.

Delmore suspects that hybrids may have a harder time surviving because they fly inefficient routes over arid or mountainous terrain: in this case, the American Southwest. Researchers will have to run another tracking study to determine whether that is the case. If Delmore’s hunch turns out to be true, then migration pathways may be a driving factor of bird speciation. For the Swainson’s thrushes, should the hybrids have trouble surviving their trips, then the coastal and inland groups might eventually evolve into separate species.

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman
Scientific American Magazine Vol 311 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Which Direction Home?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 311 No. 5 (), p. 22
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1114-22

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe