Why Scientists Are Making Kill Switches for GMOs

A genetic kill switch could prevent industrial espionage and environmental contamination

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Untold numbers of genetically modified Escherichia coli bacteria live in vats around the world, churning out useful things such as medical insulin, plastic polymers and food additives. When the reprogrammed bugs have served their role, they are packed away as industrial waste or repurposed for fertilizer.

This arrangement currently poses little environmental risk because genetically modified E. coli is weak compared with its wild cousins; it would not survive for long outside the lab. But engineered bugs not yet invented might go where they are not wanted and create risks. What if, say, an accident released more resilient engineered bugs that took over a well-balanced ecosystem? Or if tweaked bacteria shared modifications such as antibiotic resistance with their counterparts in nature through horizontal gene transfer? Or if a rival firm stole a patented bacterium for the trade secrets encoded in its DNA? Scientists are developing fail-safes for such contingencies.

In 2009 Brian Caliando, a bioengineer then at the University of California, San Francisco, began working on a way to ensure that a genetically modified organism's engineered DNA could be destroyed before a bug could escape or be stolen. He had recently read about CRISPR, a newly discovered defense tactic bacteria use to cut up and destroy DNA from invading viruses, and realized that he could use it like a built-in kill switch for genetically modified bacteria.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Caliando, under Christopher Voigt, first at U.C.S.F. and then at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, developed DNAi, a CRISPR-based system that compels bacteria to chop up their own modified DNA. Using CRISPR, Caliando programmed plasmids—tiny circles of autonomously replicating DNA—to code for the RNA bases and enzymes that form the kill switch. He then inserted those plasmids into genetically modified E. coli, where they boot up and infect the bacteria with their deadly program. Adding a sugar called arabinose to the vat throws the kill switch, and the DNAi device begins slicing up the bacteria's genetically modified DNA.

Caliando's work, published in Nature Communications this year, is a proof of concept. The same principles could be adapted to fit a variety of organisms and conditions. For example, he says, DNAi could prevent genetically modified organisms from cross-pollinating nearby fields.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe